277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7996624)
1. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
Miltenburg DM
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.
Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
Ziemer C
MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
Grote JJ; de Laat JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Rinne tuning fork test.
Swan IR
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing loss. A plan for individualized management.
Ruckenstein MJ
Postgrad Med; 1995 Oct; 98(4):197-200, 203, 206 passim. PubMed ID: 7567720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A reevaluation of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test as a patient selection criterion for laser stapedotomy.
Gordon MA; Silverstein H; Willcox TO; Rosenberg SI
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):712-7. PubMed ID: 9831142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Tuning-fork tests--outdated?].
Reiss M
Fortschr Med; 1999 Apr; 117(12):18-20. PubMed ID: 10361362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment.
Swan IR; Browning GG
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to eliminate air-bone gaps audiometrically: use too much masking.
Miller MH
Ear Nose Throat J; 2008 May; 87(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 18572783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits.
Halloran DR; Hardin JM; Wall TC
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2009 Feb; 163(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19188648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Tuning forks today? (author's transl)].
Poppendieck J
HNO; 1982 Mar; 30(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 7076519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stapedectomy for far-advanced otosclerosis.
Shea PF; Ge X; Shea JJ
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 10431881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
Chole RA; Cook GB
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of hearing loss characteristics in a clinical population.
Margolis RH; Saly GL
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 18600134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuning Fork Tests for Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.
Kelly EA; Li B; Adams ME
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Aug; 159(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 29661046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
