These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7996630)

  • 1. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processors in better versus poorer performers.
    Cafarelli Dees D; George C; Stevenson F; Sheridan C; Haacke NP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():258-60. PubMed ID: 7668660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of processing strategies on cochlear implant performance.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Apr; 165():9-14. PubMed ID: 7717634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy.
    Cowan RS; Brown C; Whitford LA; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Barker EJ; Shaw S; King A; Skok M; Seligman PM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():318-21. PubMed ID: 7668688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant.
    Skinner MW; Holden LK; Holden TA; Dowell RC; Seligman PM; Brimacombe JA; Beiter AL
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 2026285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS; Finley CC; Lawson DT; Wolford RD; Zerbi M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 8263821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
    Skinner MW; Clark GM; Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Staller SJ; Shipp DB; Shallop JK; Everingham C; Menapace CM; Arndt PL
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A within-subject comparison of adult patients using the Nucleus F0F1F2 and F0F1F2B3B4B5 speech processing strategies.
    Parkinson AJ; Tyler RS; Woodworth GG; Lowder MW; Gantz BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8729916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding of voice source information in the Nucleus cochlear implant system.
    Jones PA; McDermott HJ; Seligman PM; Millar JB
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():363-5. PubMed ID: 7668708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition with the MPEAK and SPEAK speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant.
    Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Feb; 116(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 9051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.