These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7997253)

  • 1. Promega files court challenge to Roche's Taq enzyme patent.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1994 Dec 22-29; 372(6508):714. PubMed ID: 7997253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Roche's Taq patent 'obtained by deceit', rules US court.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6763):709. PubMed ID: 10617182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roche faces charges over Taq patent claim.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1996 Aug; 382(6593):660. PubMed ID: 8751427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promega extends fight with Roche over Taq enzyme.
    Gershon D
    Nature; 1993 Apr; 362(6422):686. PubMed ID: 8469275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roche fails to get European patent on Taq polymerase.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6587):100. PubMed ID: 8700190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Roche claims victory in bid for European Taq patent.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6605):100. PubMed ID: 8906775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promega, Roche clash over use of Taq in labs.
    Lehrman S; Dickson D
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6530):348. PubMed ID: 7760915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roche asked for more Taq patent evidence.
    Nature; 1995 Mar; 374(6518):108. PubMed ID: 7877674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Australia annuls Roche's native Taq patent.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1997 Nov; 390(6658):327. PubMed ID: 9389463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roche and Promega back in court for Taq.
    Lehrman S
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6719):460. PubMed ID: 10028958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polymerase patent problems.
    Crowther SM; Burke JF; Thomas SM
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6504):312. PubMed ID: 7832901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PCR enzyme patent challenged.
    Aldhous P
    Science; 1993 Apr; 260(5107):486. PubMed ID: 8475381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promega and Roche take up battle over PCR patents.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6773):7. PubMed ID: 10716415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sparks continue to fly in Taq patent dispute.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1995 Feb; 373(6513):377. PubMed ID: 7830782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cetus battles with Du Pont.
    Gershon D
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6256):301. PubMed ID: 2300180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patent on PCR enzymes may re-ignite old controversy.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6503):212. PubMed ID: 7969459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promega changes tack in battle over patent.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6965):373. PubMed ID: 14647346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promega wins round in fight over Taq.
    Barinaga M
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5278):1039. PubMed ID: 8711480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European patent for PCR enzyme clouded by Russian claim.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6432):2. PubMed ID: 8316294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PCR. Roche dealt a setback on European Taq patent.
    Service RF
    Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5523):1815. PubMed ID: 11397920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.