234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7997291)
1. The work of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction.
White GB
Nursingconnections; 1994; 7(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 7997291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical advice in reproductive medicine.
Jonsen AR; Cohen CB
Fertil Steril; 1994 Feb; 61(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 8299774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technologies, ads, and ethics: philosophical, ethical, and clinical perspectives on the use of advertising in reproductive medicine. A conference held by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction.
Macklin R; White GB
Womens Health Issues; 1997; 7(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 9203857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Russian Medical Association: the National Ethics Committee.
Russian Medical Association
J Int Bioethique; 2000 Mar; 11(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 12174860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Statut: centralnej etickej komisie ministerstva zdravotnictva Slovenskej Republiky / Statute: Central Ethics Committee Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic.
Med Etika Bioet; 2004; 11(1-2):7-13. PubMed ID: 16294452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolving role of ethics advisory committees in VHA.
Nelson WA; Wlody GS
HEC Forum; 1997 Jun; 9(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 10169718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between the Central ("National") Ethics Committee and local ethics committees in the Slovak Republic.
Glasa J
Med Etika Bioet; 2004; 11(3-4):9-10. PubMed ID: 16294448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproduction: a process ripe for regulation? A conference of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction.
Jonsen AR; Macklin R; White GB
Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8672893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A word to the wise.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(2):5. PubMed ID: 8026940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New reproductive technologies: the Canadian perspective.
Baird PA
Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):156-66. PubMed ID: 8672901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond case consultation: an expanded model for organizational ethics.
Pentz RD
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10394536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH panel opens debate on ethics of embryo research.
Gershon D
Nature; 1994 Feb; 367(6463):502. PubMed ID: 8107817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it time to clone a bioethics commission?
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 8045766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical ethics. Italian committee loses its balance.
Biggin S
Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5196):326. PubMed ID: 7824927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EuropaBio's ethics committee and Advisory Group on Ethics(AGE): an overview.
Tambuyzer E; Moll N; Muys P
J Biolaw Bus; 2002; 5(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 12739547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Development and Rationale for CECA's Case-Based Study Guide.
Agich GJ
J Clin Ethics; 2018; 29(2):158-161. PubMed ID: 29916833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the practice of ethics consultation: results of an ethnographic multi-site study.
Kelly SE; Marshall PA; Sanders LM; Raffin TA; Koenig BA
J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(2):136-49. PubMed ID: 9302631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. White House bill would ban human cloning.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6634):644. PubMed ID: 9192876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethics and the HMO.
Felder M
HEC Forum; 1997 Dec; 9(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 10175651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The status of regulation of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
Jones HW
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Jul; 10(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 8003876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
