These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7997549)

  • 1. Quality-oriented mass mammography screening.
    Burhenne LJ; Burhenne HJ; Kan L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):185-8. PubMed ID: 7997549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months.
    Burhenne LJ; Hislop TG; Burhenne HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 1307850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography.
    Cyrlak D
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 3406395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.
    Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S
    CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruiting older women for screening mammography.
    Halabi S; Vogel VG; Bondy ML; Vernon SW
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 8402722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
    Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
    N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A screening mammography program. Staying alive and making it work.
    Monsees BS; Destouet JM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):211-9. PubMed ID: 1732928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of mass screening for breast cancer in the Somme district (France) between 1990 and 1996].
    Ganry O; Peng J; Dubreuil A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Sep; 47(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 10519174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993.
    Clay MG; Hislop TG; Kan L; Olivotto IA; Burhenne LJ
    Am J Surg; 1994 May; 167(5):490-2. PubMed ID: 8185033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pilot study.
    Hislop TG; Burhenne LJ; Basco VE; Ng VT
    Can J Public Health; 1991; 82(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 1884310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixed-facility workplace screening mammography.
    Reynolds HE; Larkin GN; Jackson VP; Hawes DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):507-10. PubMed ID: 9016236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-cost screening mammography: report on finances and review of 21,716 consecutive cases.
    Bird RE
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 2494683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and conduct of a low-cost mammography screening project: experience of the American Cancer Society, Texas Division.
    Vogel VG; Peters GN; Evans WP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1727357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile mammographic screening of self-referred women: results of 22,540 screenings.
    Dershaw DD; Liberman L; Lippin BS
    Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 1620839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.