These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7997552)

  • 1. Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly.
    Faulk RM; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):193-7. PubMed ID: 7997552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance.
    Frankel SD; Sickles EA; Curpen BN; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1107-9. PubMed ID: 7717214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers.
    Sener SF; Winchester DJ; Winchester DP; Kurek R; Motykie G; Martz CH; Rabbitt S
    Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):731-5; discussion 735-6. PubMed ID: 10432082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features with pathologic correlation.
    Evans AJ; Pinder S; Ellis IO; Sibbering M; Elston CW; Poller DN; Wilson R
    Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):237-40. PubMed ID: 8134579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between age, mammographic features and pathological tumour characteristics in non-palpable breast cancer.
    Ferranti C; Coopmans de Yoldi G; Biganzoli E; Bergonzi S; Mariani L; Scaperrotta G; Marchesini M
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):698-705. PubMed ID: 11089459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related differences in patients with nonpalpable breast carcinomas.
    Wazer DE; Gage I; Homer MJ; Krosnick SH; Schmid C
    Cancer; 1996 Oct; 78(7):1432-7. PubMed ID: 8839548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Poplack SP; Wells WA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jun; 170(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 9609171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital mammography screening: average glandular dose and first performance parameters.
    Weigel S; Girnus R; Czwoydzinski J; Decker T; Spital S; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):892-5. PubMed ID: 17705112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Invasive breast cancer: mammographic measurement.
    Flanagan FL; McDermott MB; Barton PT; Pilgram TK; Dehdashti F; Wick MR; Monsees BS
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):819-23. PubMed ID: 8638011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings.
    Evans A; Pinder S; Wilson R; Sibbering M; Poller D; Elston C; Ellis I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1307-11. PubMed ID: 8191988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of contralateral surveillance mammography for primary breast cancer follow-up.
    Kollias J; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Blamey RW
    World J Surg; 2000 Aug; 24(8):983-7; discussion 988-9. PubMed ID: 10865045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcome assessment in mammography: an audit of 7,506 screening and diagnostic mammography examinations.
    Tunçbilek I; Ozdemir A; Gültekin S; Oğur T; Erman R; Yüce C
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Dec; 13(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 18092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of additional imaging increased specificity and decreased sensitivity in screening mammography.
    Geller BM; Vacek PM; Skelly J; Harvey SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):942-50. PubMed ID: 16085198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years.
    Thurfjell EL; Lindgren JA
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 8888234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is surgical management compromised in elderly patients with breast cancer?
    Wanebo HJ; Cole B; Chung M; Vezeridis M; Schepps B; Fulton J; Bland K
    Ann Surg; 1997 May; 225(5):579-86; discussion 586-9. PubMed ID: 9193185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.