These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7997834)

  • 21. A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Probst R; Harris FP
    Prog Brain Res; 1993; 97():91-9. PubMed ID: 8234771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Otoacoustic emission estimates of human basilar membrane impulse response duration and cochlear filter tuning.
    Raufer S; Verhulst S
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():150-160. PubMed ID: 27989947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Otoacoustic emissions in young adults: Effects of blood group.
    Chow KT; McPherson B; Fuente A
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():194-200. PubMed ID: 26375628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.
    Verhulst S; Dau T; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3842-8. PubMed ID: 23231114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.
    Wang Y; Gong Q; Zhang T
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 May; 15(1):51. PubMed ID: 27160830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Engler S; Köppl C; Manley GA; de Kleine E; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107835. PubMed ID: 31710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of middle-ear effusion on otoacoustic emissions.
    Yeo SW; Park SN; Park YS; Suh BD
    J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Oct; 116(10):794-9. PubMed ID: 12437833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.
    Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):843-62. PubMed ID: 24013802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The effect of systematic change in middle ear pressure on transitorily evoked otoacoustic emissions--a pressure chamber study].
    Hauser R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Dec; 71(12):632-6. PubMed ID: 1492889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.
    Aguilar E; Eustaquio-Martin A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 14(3):341-57. PubMed ID: 23423559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Bennett CL; Özdamar Ö
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1833-44. PubMed ID: 20968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Otoacoustic Emissions in Smoking and Nonsmoking Young Adults.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Koziel M; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 8(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26622946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 9112111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The relation between otoacoustic emissions and the broadening of the auditory filter for higher levels.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 126(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 9872128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Harrison WA; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2649-58. PubMed ID: 8270741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.