These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7998544)

  • 1. The gray-scale ink-jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images.
    Combs MJ; Snell J; Cail WS; Maier T; Buck DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):225-7. PubMed ID: 7998544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Demonstration of digital radiographs by means of ink jet-printed paper copies: pilot study.
    Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Nilsson J; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Nov; 5(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 1457540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dry laser printer versus paper printer in full-field digital mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Guo X; Rong D; Kang R; Mao G; Liu J; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 20092369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproduction of radiologic images on plain paper.
    Ibbott GS; Zhang Y; Mohiuddin M; Adams E
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 9599396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dry silver hard copies in digital radiography.
    Trefler M; Yrizarry JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Oct; 149(4):853-6. PubMed ID: 3498340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of ink jets in ultrasound registrations.
    Johansson T; Nilsson J; Almquist LO; Holmer NG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 1962356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effective poster and print production with digital camera and computer technology.
    Chen MY; Ott DJ; Rohde RP; Henson E; Gelfand DW; Boehme JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):955-7. PubMed ID: 9308444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A fast flexible ink-jet printing method for patterning dissociated neurons in culture.
    Sanjana NE; Fuller SB
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):151-63. PubMed ID: 15183267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality of film transparency printer output of digital dental radiographs.
    Sakurai T; Matsumoto Y; Onoyama K; Kawamata R; Kashima I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 15772599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synthesis of monodisperse silver nanoparticles for ink-jet printed flexible electronics.
    Zhang Z; Zhang X; Xin Z; Deng M; Wen Y; Song Y
    Nanotechnology; 2011 Oct; 22(42):425601. PubMed ID: 21937786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ink jet color printing of digital medical images.
    Nilsson J; Johansson T; Holmer NG; Hertz CH
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Jul; 31(4):414-6. PubMed ID: 2206700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suitability of the general-purpose graphic printer as an image output device for digital dental x-ray images.
    Nishikawa K; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 10710467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biosurface engineering through ink jet printing.
    Khan MS; Fon D; Li X; Tian J; Forsythe J; Garnier G; Shen W
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2010 Feb; 75(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 19879112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of individually calibrated customary printers for assessment of typical dental diagnoses on glossy paper prints: a multicenter pilot study.
    Schulze RK; Schulze D; Voss K; Rottner M; Keller HP; Dollmann K; Maager B; Wedel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 18299235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image calibration of laser digitizers, printers, and gray-scale displays.
    Siegel EL; Templeton AW; Cook LT; Eckard DA; Harrison LA; Dwyer SJ
    Radiographics; 1992 Mar; 12(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 1561421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel method for producing x-ray test objects and phantoms.
    Theodorakou C; Horrocks JA; Marshall NW; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1423-38. PubMed ID: 15152683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of bi-level image converting methods for nuclear medicine image database stored in the IS&C magneto-optical disk.
    Tsukamoto N; Ando Y; Kunieda E; Kawaguchi O; Shigematsu N; Kubo A; Arai Y
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():442. PubMed ID: 8591224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ink-jet printout of radiographs on transparent film and glossy paper versus monitor display: an ROC analysis.
    Kühl S; Krummenauer F; Dagassan-Berndt D; Lambrecht TJ; d'Hoedt B; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 20306098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.