283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7998574)
1. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen.
Lee CH; Carter D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 7998574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma.
Graham RA; Homer MJ; Sigler CJ; Safaii H; Schmid CH; Marchant DJ; Smith TJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8273685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathologic and mammographic findings predicting the adequacy of tumor excision before breast-conserving therapy.
Beron PJ; Horwitz EM; Martinez AA; Wimbish KJ; Levine AJ; Gustafson G; Chen PY; Ingold JA; Vicini FA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Dec; 167(6):1409-14. PubMed ID: 8956568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Localization of impalpable breast masses: value of sonography in the operating room and scanning of excised specimens.
Fornage BD; Ross MI; Singletary SE; Paulus DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):569-73. PubMed ID: 8079846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiological review of specimen radiographs after breast localisation biopsy is not always necessary.
Coombs NJ; Vassallo PP; Parker AJ; Yiangou C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Jun; 32(5):516-9. PubMed ID: 16644176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy.
Orel SG; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Fraker DL; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 9356624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast surgical specimen radiographs: how reliable are they?
Britton PD; Sonoda LI; Yamamoto AK; Koo B; Soh E; Goud A
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 20303687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical specimen ultrasound: is it able to predict the status of resection margins after breast-conserving surgery?
Londero V; Zuiani C; Panozzo M; Linda A; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2010 Dec; 19(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 20609586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prebiopsy localisation of impalpable breast lesions.
Hisham AN; Harjit K; Fatimah O; Yun SI
Med J Malaysia; 2004 Aug; 59(3):402-5. PubMed ID: 15727388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can preoperative factors predict for residual malignancy after breast biopsy for invasive cancer?
Walls J; Knox F; Baildam AD; Asbury DL; Mansel RE; Bundred NJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1995 Jul; 77(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 7574313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small (< 2.0-cm) breast cancers: mammographic and US findings at US-guided cryoablation--initial experience.
Roubidoux MA; Sabel MS; Bailey JE; Kleer CG; Klein KA; Helvie MA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):857-67. PubMed ID: 15567802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radioguided localization of nonpalpable breast cancer lesions: randomized comparison with wire localization in patients undergoing conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy.
Mariscal Martínez A; Solà M; de Tudela AP; Julián JF; Fraile M; Vizcaya S; Fernández J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 19770322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications.
Aref A; Youssef E; Washington T; Segel M; Grigorian C; Bongers S; Bouwman D
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10696735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to go wireless? A 15-year single institution experience of radioisotope occult lesion localisation (ROLL) for impalpable breast lesions.
Hawkins SC; Brown I; King P; El-Gammal M; Stepp K; Widdison S; Barta M; Jackson N; Drew P; English R; Ahmad S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 27667335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specimen radiographs assist in identifying and assessing resection margins of occult breast carcinomas.
Young ES; Hogg DE; Krontiras H; Bernreuter W; Urist M; Bland KI; Chhieng DC
Breast J; 2009; 15(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 19624413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
