These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7999417)

  • 1. Delayed diagnosis and large size of breast cancer after a false negative mammogram.
    Joensuu H; Asola R; Holli K; Kumpulainen E; Nikkanen V; Parvinen LM
    Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(9):1299-302. PubMed ID: 7999417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ; Turner MJ
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Feb; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 1573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
    Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
    Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographically negative breast cancer at the Strathfield Breast Centre.
    Chew SB; Hughes M; Kennedy C; Gillett D; Carmalt H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Mar; 66(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 8639127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
    Dabbous FM; Dolecek TA; Berbaum ML; Friedewald SM; Summerfelt WT; Hoskins K; Rauscher GH
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Mar; 26(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 28183826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
    Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The misuse of mammography in the management of breast cancer.
    Walker QJ; Langlands AO
    Med J Aust; 1986 Sep; 145(5):185-7. PubMed ID: 3747891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Carcinoma with false negative mammogram: when and how?].
    Roger P; Delfour C; Ragu N; Serre I; Baldet P; Taourel P
    J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 85(12 Pt 2):2063-7. PubMed ID: 15692420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False negative mammograms causing delay in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Burns PE; Grace MG; Lees AW; May C
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1979 Jun; 30(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 457739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
    Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
    Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography of women with suspicious breast lumps.
    Young JO; Sadowsky NL; Young JW; Herman L
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 3718215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Staging primary breast cancer. Are there tumour pathological features that correlate with a false-negative axillary ultrasound?
    Johnson S; Brown S; Porter G; Steel J; Paisley K; Watkins R; Holgate C
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Jun; 66(6):497-9. PubMed ID: 21367404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of mammography in 1096 consecutive patients with breast cancer, 1979-1993: equal value for patients younger and older than age 50 years.
    Cody HS
    Cancer; 1995 Nov; 76(9):1579-84. PubMed ID: 8635061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms.
    Mann BD; Giuliano AE; Bassett LW; Barber MS; Hallauer W; Morton DL
    Arch Surg; 1983 Jan; 118(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 6848070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
    Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancers invisible on mammography.
    Foxcroft LM; Evans EB; Joshua HK; Hirst C
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Mar; 70(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 10765896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.