136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8000591)
1. Echocardiographic features of the normofunctional Labcor-Santiago pericardial bioprosthesis.
Gonzalez-Juanatey JR; Garcia-Bengoechea JB; Vega M; Rubio J; Sierra J; Duran D; Amaro A; Gil M
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 8000591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The stentless quadrileaflet bovine pericardial mitral valve: echocardiographic assessment.
Middlemost SJ; Manga P
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Mar; 8(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 10224579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of the design on the medium to long-term hemodynamic behavior of 19 mm pericardial aortic valve prostheses.
Gonzalez-Juanatey JR; Garcia-Bengoechea JB; Garcia-Acuna JM; Vega Fernandez M; Amaro Cendon A; Varela Roman A; Gil de la Pena M
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S317-23. PubMed ID: 8953461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The new Labcor-Santiago pericardial bioprosthesis.
Garcia-Bengochea JB; Casagrande I; Gonzalez-Juanatey JR; Puig L; Rubio J; Duran D; Sierra J
J Card Surg; 1991 Dec; 6(4 Suppl):613-9. PubMed ID: 1810555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of high transvalvular velocities early after implantation of Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
Bach DS; Lemire MS; Eberhart D; Armstrong WF; Deeb GM
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 10947047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The aortic Elan stentless aortic valve: excellent hemodynamics and ease of implantation.
Flynn M; Iaccovoni A; Pathi V; Butler J; Macarthur KJ; Berg GA
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):48-54. PubMed ID: 11805949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two years' clinical experience with a quadrileaflet stentless bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
Aybek T; Simon A; Dogan S; Greinecker GW; Moritz A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep; 9(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 11041182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A Doppler echocardiographic study of normal and dysfunctioning Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses].
Bonaduce D; Breglio R; Conforti G; Montemurro MV; Petretta M; Covino E; Morgano G; Bianchi V
G Ital Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 20(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 2328859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study.
Chambers JB; Wang Z; Cooke RA; Black MM
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 8665004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An echocardiographic description of the Sulzer Carbomedics Synergy ST (Labcor) porcine valve in the aortic position.
Chambers J; Dolman W; Jawetz J; Ramos A; Collaco J; Barros-Pena J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Sep; 9(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 11041181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic evaluation of 23 mm Pericarbon and 23 mm Hancock II bioprostheses in the aortic position at mid-term follow up.
Ius P; Totis O; Chirillo F; Cavarzerani A; Zussa C; Piccoli C; Valfrè C
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 8953444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
Bach DS; Goldman B; Verrier E; Petracek M; Wood J; Goldman S; David T;
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative study of Toronto SPV prosthesis and bileaflet mechanical aortic prosthesis with 2D-Doppler echocardiography].
Martins S; Neves F; Soares RM; Cacela D; do Rosário L; Coelho P; Mendes J; Robalo F; Castelão N; Antunes AM; Roquette J
Rev Port Cardiol; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1111-6. PubMed ID: 10661018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early postoperative outcome and hemodynamic performance of the sorin pericarbon stentless aortic valve.
Bonacchi M; Giunti G; Prifti E; Rostagno C; Bini M; Frati G; Sani G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 12358408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
