136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8000591)
21. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stentless bioprostheses for the small aortic root.
Walther T; Falk V; Diegeler A; Autschbach R; Gummert J; Baryalei M; Mohr FW
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S302-7. PubMed ID: 8953458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the hemodynamic performance of the Lillehei-Kaster and Medtronic Hall valves in aortic position].
Kirzner CF; Campos Filho O; Buffolo E
Arq Bras Cardiol; 1993 Nov; 61(5):265-72. PubMed ID: 8147722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
García-Bengochea J; Sierra J; González-Juanatey JR; Rubio J; Vega M; Fernández AL; Sánchez D
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Hemodynamic and anatomic characteristics of the normal Mitroflow biological valve--in vivo determination using 2-dimensional echocardiography].
Nadazdin A
Med Arh; 1989; 43(4-6):219-22. PubMed ID: 2640278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early hemodynamic results of the Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic bioprostheses.
Cattaneo P; Bruno VD; Mariscalco G; Marchetti P; Ferrarese S; Salerno-Uriarte J; Sala A
J Card Surg; 2007; 22(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 17803572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical experience with the 3F stentless aortic bioprosthesis: one-year follow up.
Linneweber J; Kossagk C; Rogge ML; Dushe S; Dohmen P; Konertz W
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 16901052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hemodynamic characterization of the Sorin Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis at rest and exercise.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Ruzicka D; Badiu CC; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jan; 18(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 19301559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Hemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position.
Rossiter SJ; Miller DC; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Moreno-Cabral RJ; Mace JG; Robert EW; Tsagaris TJ; Sutton RB; Alderman EL; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7382536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Doppler evaluation of the Sorin and Medtronic-Hall prostheses in the aortic position].
Raisaro A; Caizzi V; Roda G; Minzioni G; Bargiggia G; Bertucci C; Recusani F; Tronconi L
G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 18(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 3169469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro pulsatile flow evaluation of a stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
Sung HW; Le TN; Kingsbury CJ; Quintero LJ; Myers KE; Quijano RC
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7727828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
Chambers J; Cross J; Deverall P; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Feb; 21(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 8426004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis.
Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Miller FA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Echo-Doppler evaluation of normal Starr-Edwards prostheses in mitral and aortic position].
Lefebvre E; Isorni C; Rey JL; Lesbre JP
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1987 Jun; 80(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 3118834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
