These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 800266)
1. The severely defective newborn: the dilemma and the decision process. Heymann PB; Holtz S Public Policy; 1975; 23(4):381-417. PubMed ID: 800266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn. Portela C Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spina bifida: the fate of the untreated. Reid R Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 330459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary euthanasia of defective newborns: a legal analysis. Robertson JA Stanford Law Rev; 1975 Jan; 27(2):213-69. PubMed ID: 1235925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: a description of Canadian practices. Magnet JE Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():271-92. PubMed ID: 10258798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Defective children, their parents, and the death decision. Nolan-Haley JM J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Jan; 4(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1082475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical authority and infanticide. Malone PA J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On letting some babies die. Smith DH Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment? Smith GP J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Meningomyelocele: to treat or not to treat. Cooperman EM Can Med Assoc J; 1977 Jun; 116(12):1339-40. PubMed ID: 324594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues raised by new treatment options. Smith JB MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 2498598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When the neonate is defective. Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Issues in health care meriting particular Christian concern--a priority issue: the severely defective newborn. Roy DJ Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 11650521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Terminating treatment: age as a standard. Callahan D Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):21-5. PubMed ID: 3692803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions. Rhoden NK Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Treating defective newborns: the ethical dilemma. Brant J; McNulty A Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):34-36,45-47. PubMed ID: 11651708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The swing of the pendulum: the indications for operating on myelomeningoceles. Rickham PP Med J Aust; 1976 Nov; 2(20):743-6. PubMed ID: 794660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A matter of life and death: Reform Judaism and the defective child. Block RA J Reform Jud; 1984; 41(4):14-30. PubMed ID: 11651763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]