These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8002758)

  • 41. Influence of early variables in traumatic brain injury on functional independence measure scores and rehabilitation length of stay and charges.
    Cowen TD; Meythaler JM; DeVivo MJ; Ivie CS; Lebow J; Novack TA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Sep; 76(9):797-803. PubMed ID: 7668948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Continuity of care during hospital and after hospitalization for the patients with stroke. Comparing the level of independence in ADL and care needs].
    Ushikubo M; Shimanouchi S; Yamanobe T; Hosaka S
    Kango Kenkyu; 1993; 26(6):515-28. PubMed ID: 8182904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome.
    Novack TA; Satterfield WT; Lyons K; Kolski G; Hackmeyer L; Connor M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Jun; 65(6):316-9. PubMed ID: 6732459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Outcome of Intensive Care Unit-Dependent, Tracheotomized Patients with Cerebrovascular Diseases.
    Ponfick M; Wiederer R; Nowak DA
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1527-31. PubMed ID: 25881771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Functional outcome in brain stem stroke patients after rehabilitation.
    Chua KS; Kong KH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Feb; 77(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 8607746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cross-validation of a model for predicting functional status and length of stay in patients with stroke.
    Sebastia E; Duarte E; Boza R; Samitier B; Tejero M; Marco E; Muniesa JM; Belmonte R; Escalada F
    J Rehabil Med; 2006 May; 38(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 16702089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of rehabilitation therapy on the prognosis for stroke patients--a preliminary study.
    Lin JH; Wei SH; Liu CK; Huang MH; Lin YT
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 1999 May; 15(5):280-91. PubMed ID: 10375871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine.
    Grimby G; Gudjonsson G; Rodhe M; Sunnerhagen KS; Sundh V; Ostensson ML
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1996 May; 28(2):51-62. PubMed ID: 8815989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Initial functional independence measure score and interval post stroke help assess outcome, length of hospitalization, and quality of care.
    Ancheta J; Husband M; Law D; Reding M
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2000; 14(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 15470823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm.
    Widén Holmqvist L; von Koch L; Kostulas V; Holm M; Widsell G; Tegler H; Johansson K; Almazán J; de Pedro-Cuesta J
    Stroke; 1998 Mar; 29(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 9506598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stroke rehabilitation: Australian patient profile and functional outcome.
    Shah S; Vanclay F; Cooper B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 1986054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
    Jørgensen HS; Nakayama H; Raaschou HO; Vive-Larsen J; Støier M; Olsen TS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 May; 76(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 7741608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Stroke rehabilitation: correlation and prognostic value of computerized tomography and sequential functional assessments.
    Hertanu JS; Demopoulos JT; Yang WC; Calhoun WF; Fenigstein HA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Sep; 65(9):505-8. PubMed ID: 6477080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients.
    Kalra L; Crome P
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1993 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 8463526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stroke rehabilitation in south Auckland; the value of an effective rehabilitation unit.
    Eason R; Bowie E; Okpala J
    N Z Med J; 1995 Jul; 108(1004):289-91. PubMed ID: 7637937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stroke rehabilitation. 5. Stroke outcome.
    Cifu DX; Lorish TR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 May; 75(5 Spec No):S56-60. PubMed ID: 8185465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction of length of hospital stay following stroke.
    Brock K; Robinson P; Simondson J; Goldie P; Nosworthy J; Greenwood K
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1997 Mar; 17(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 9107604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A systematic review of studies reporting multivariable models to predict functional outcomes after post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation.
    Meyer MJ; Pereira S; McClure A; Teasell R; Thind A; Koval J; Richardson M; Speechley M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(15):1316-23. PubMed ID: 25250807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression.
    Andrews PJ; Sleeman DH; Statham PF; McQuatt A; Corruble V; Jones PA; Howells TP; Macmillan CS
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Aug; 97(2):326-36. PubMed ID: 12186460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stroke rehabilitation outcome. A potential use of predictive variables to establish levels of care.
    Alexander MP
    Stroke; 1994 Jan; 25(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 8266360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.