These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The CELAY system: a comparison of the fit of direct and indirect fabrication techniques. Siervo S; Bandettini B; Siervo P; Falleni A; Siervo R Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):434-39. PubMed ID: 7802911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Copy-milled all-ceramic restorations: case reports. Sevük C; Gür H; Akkayan B Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 12014164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finishing of MGC Dicor material. Shearer AC; Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Heymann HO; Wilson NH Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 8003198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An indirect/direct method for contouring and finishing Cerec restorations. Tsotsos S Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jan; 4(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 11441565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preparation of bonded porcelain inlays and onlays using a milling-coping system]. Hendrix E; Staes D; Boute P Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1993; 48(3):55-66. PubMed ID: 8085027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Siervo S; Pampalone A; Siervo P; Siervo R Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 7568682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Otto T; De Nisco S Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CAD/CAM and its effect on the future of dental laboratory technology. Rommerdale EH Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1993; 10(6):21-6. PubMed ID: 8272748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ceramic inlays and onlays]. van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system. Allen KL; Schenkel AB; Estafan D Gen Dent; 2004; 52(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 15206254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Otto T; Schneider D Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of confocal microscopy to assess surface roughness of two milled CAD-CAM ceramics following two polishing techniques. Al-Shammery HA; Bubb NL; Youngson CC; Fasbinder DJ; Wood DJ Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):736-41. PubMed ID: 16914192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]