BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8003200)

  • 1. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts.
    Cohen BI; Condos S; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 8003200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of five core materials.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17244304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Condos S; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 8933438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B; Pagnillo MK; Schulman A; Hittelman E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 10898840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Nov; 78(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 9399187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs.
    Bolhuis HPB ; De Gee AJ; Feilzer AJ; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 11803991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of thermocycling on the fracture toughness and hardness of core buildup materials.
    Medina Tirado JI; Nagy WW; Dhuru VB; Ziebert AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 11725275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading.
    Dilmener FT; Sipahi C; Dalkiz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 16473087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ex vivo study of the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of teeth restored with composite core and different post and core systems.
    Al-Omiri MK; Al-Wahadni AM
    Int Endod J; 2006 Nov; 39(11):890-9. PubMed ID: 17014528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications.
    Gateau P; Sabek M; Dailey B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11514801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of post type and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    McLaren JD; McLaren CI; Yaman P; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Dennison JD; McDonald NJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 19231569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
    Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the retention of 5 core materials supported by a dental post.
    Gu S; Isidro M; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 16602368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
    Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems].
    Ersoy E; Cetiner S; Koçak F
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 2518746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.