211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8003719)
1. Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Teno JM; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Murphy D; Youngner SJ; Bellamy P; Connors AF; Desbiens NA; Fulkerson W; Knaus WA
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8003719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes research and advance directives.
Sugarman J
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8003729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confronting the "near irrelevance" of advance directives.
Dresser R
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 8003727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advance directives: what is it reasonable to expect from them?
Brock DW
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 8003728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The physician's role in completing advance directives: ensuring patients' capacity to make healthcare decisions in advance.
Wenger NS; Halpern J
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 7749178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients should not always come first in treatment decisions.
Strong C
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 8490224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The case of the coercive family.
Marshall PA; Hartz J; Tan SY
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(1):135-6; discussion 136-42. PubMed ID: 8032514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patients with DNR orders in the operating room: surgery, resuscitation, and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Wenger NS; Greengold NL; Oye RK; Kussin P; Phillips RS; Desbiens NA; Liu H; Hiatt JR; Teno JM; Connors AF
J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 9436083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Do physicians' own preferences for life-sustaining treatment influence their perceptions of patients' preferences?
Schneiderman LJ; Kaplan RM; Pearlman RA; Teetzel H
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 8490215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Teno J; Lynn J; Connors AF; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Alzola C; Murphy DP; Desbiens N; Knaus WA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 9100723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.
Luce JM
West J Med; 1997 Dec; 167(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 9426480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. POLST is coming to New Jersey.
Weaver S
N J Nurse; 2011 Jul; 41(3):7. PubMed ID: 21882571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Rosenfeld KE; Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Connors AF; Dawson NV; Layde P; Califf RM; Liu H; Lynn J; Oye RK
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jul; 156(14):1558-64. PubMed ID: 8687264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. End-of-life decisions: an important theme in the care for people with intellectual disabilities.
Wagemans A; van Schrojenstein Lantman-de-Valk H; Tuffrey-Wijne I; Widdershoven G; Curfs L
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2010 Jun; 54(6):516-24. PubMed ID: 20367746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal implications of withholding and withdrawing medical treatment.
Haddad AM; Kapp MB
Caring; 1991 Sep; 10(9):14-9. PubMed ID: 10114395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The stability of DNR orders on hospital readmission. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Wenger NS; Oye RK; Desbiens NA; Phillips RS; Teno JM; Connors AF; Liu H; Zemsky MF; Kussin P
J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 8790698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advance directives: legal remedies and psychosocial interventions.
Lens V; Pollack D
Death Stud; 2000; 24(5):377-99. PubMed ID: 11067672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Levels of care in the intensive care unit: a research program.
Cook D; Rocker G; Marshall J; Griffith L; McDonald E; Guyatt G; ;
Am J Crit Care; 2006 May; 15(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 16632769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical dilemmas when patients want assistance in dying.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 8003720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
