These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8003876)
1. The status of regulation of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Jones HW J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Jul; 10(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 8003876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproduction: a process ripe for regulation? A conference of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction. Jonsen AR; Macklin R; White GB Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8672893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Groups set up panel on use of fetal tissue. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Private bioethics forums: counterpoint to government bodies. Cohen CB; McCloskey EL Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Sep; 4(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 10136667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technologies, ads, and ethics: philosophical, ethical, and clinical perspectives on the use of advertising in reproductive medicine. A conference held by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction. Macklin R; White GB Womens Health Issues; 1997; 7(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 9203857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Greater regulation of fertility encouraged. Bioethics Council seeking changes. Weiss R Washington Post; 2004 Apr; ():A8. PubMed ID: 15250092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A clone by any other name is still an ethical concern. Voelker R JAMA; 1994 Feb; 271(5):331-2. PubMed ID: 8283567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical issues in assisted reproductive medicine: a pragmatic approach. Appleton T Br J Urol; 1995 Nov; 76 Suppl 2():85-92. PubMed ID: 8535762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislation on the practice of assisted reproduction in Western Australia. Yovich JL; Matson PL J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar; 13(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11644841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommendation is near on embryo cell research: ethics panel expected to urge end to ban. Wade N N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Distributive justice and the regulation of fertility centers: an analysis of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act. Baker DJ; Paterson MA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 7994463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Much ado about mutton? Greenberg DS Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1850. PubMed ID: 11654834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics of cloning: who decides? Weiss R Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel. Green RM Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Mar; 5(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 11645298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]