139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8004594)
1. The abnormal mammogram radiographic findings, diagnostic options, pathology, and stage of cancer diagnosis.
McKenna RJ
Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):244-55. PubMed ID: 8004594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic abnormalities and the detection of carcinoma of the breast.
Hall JA; Murphy DC; Hall BR; Hall KA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1677-80; discussion 1680-2. PubMed ID: 8317508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonpalpable breast lesions at biopsy. A detailed analysis of radiographic features.
Skinner MA; Swain M; Simmons R; McCarty KS; Sullivan DC; Iglehart JD
Ann Surg; 1988 Aug; 208(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 3401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted analysis of mammographic clustered calcifications.
Freundlich IM; Hunter TB; Seeley GW; D'Orsi CJ; Sadowsky NL
Clin Radiol; 1989 May; 40(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 2752688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stereotactic Biopsy of Segmental Breast Calcifications: Is Sampling of Anterior and Posterior Components Necessary?
Raj SD; Sedgwick EL; Severs FJ; Hilsenbeck SG; Wang T; Sepulveda KA
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):682-6. PubMed ID: 27052522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frozen section examination of breast biopsies. Practice parameter.
Fechner RE
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 103(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 7817947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
Bhothisuwan W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
Hindle WH; Chen EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Xia JQ; Ghate S; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 15728613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of non-mass calcifications: outcome and accuracy at long-term follow-up.
Han BK; Choe YH; Ko YH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yang JH
Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 14726638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
