These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8004594)

  • 1. The abnormal mammogram radiographic findings, diagnostic options, pathology, and stage of cancer diagnosis.
    McKenna RJ
    Cancer; 1994 Jul; 74(1 Suppl):244-55. PubMed ID: 8004594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic abnormalities and the detection of carcinoma of the breast.
    Hall JA; Murphy DC; Hall BR; Hall KA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1677-80; discussion 1680-2. PubMed ID: 8317508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonpalpable breast lesions at biopsy. A detailed analysis of radiographic features.
    Skinner MA; Swain M; Simmons R; McCarty KS; Sullivan DC; Iglehart JD
    Ann Surg; 1988 Aug; 208(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 3401063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted analysis of mammographic clustered calcifications.
    Freundlich IM; Hunter TB; Seeley GW; D'Orsi CJ; Sadowsky NL
    Clin Radiol; 1989 May; 40(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 2752688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation.
    Bennett ML; Welman CJ; Celliers LM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Oct; 66(10):928-39. PubMed ID: 21718976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
    Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
    Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereotactic Biopsy of Segmental Breast Calcifications: Is Sampling of Anterior and Posterior Components Necessary?
    Raj SD; Sedgwick EL; Severs FJ; Hilsenbeck SG; Wang T; Sepulveda KA
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):682-6. PubMed ID: 27052522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frozen section examination of breast biopsies. Practice parameter.
    Fechner RE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 103(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 7817947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
    Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
    Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
    Bhothisuwan W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
    Hindle WH; Chen EC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
    Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
    Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications.
    Soo MS; Rosen EL; Xia JQ; Ghate S; Baker JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 15728613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of non-mass calcifications: outcome and accuracy at long-term follow-up.
    Han BK; Choe YH; Ko YH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yang JH
    Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 14726638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
    Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
    Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.