These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8004594)

  • 21. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
    Kuzmiak CM; Dancel R; Pisano E; Zeng D; Cole E; Koomen MA; McLelland R
    Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 16627203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. False-negative breast screening assessment: what lessons can we learn?
    Burrell HC; Evans AJ; Wilson AR; Pinder SE
    Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11384136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation of lesions detected by mammography. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists.
    CMAJ; 1998 Feb; 158 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 9484273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammography-detected ultrasound-negative asymptomatic micro-calcifications in Chinese women: Would it be safe to watch and wait?
    Xu Y; Pan B; Zhou YD; Yao R; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Mao F; Lin Y; Shen SJ; Sun Q
    Med Hypotheses; 2018 Sep; 118():9-12. PubMed ID: 30037622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening.
    Mello-Thoms C; Chapman B
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):894-908. PubMed ID: 15288040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The changing mammogram. A primary indication for needle localization biopsy.
    Wilhelm MC; de Paredes ES; Pope T; Wanebo HJ
    Arch Surg; 1986 Nov; 121(11):1311-4. PubMed ID: 3778204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancers invisible on mammography.
    Foxcroft LM; Evans EB; Joshua HK; Hirst C
    Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Mar; 70(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 10765896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic detection of breast cancer in women under the age of 35.
    Jeffries DO; Adler DD
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 2153644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic analysis of calcifications.
    Bassett LW
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 1732937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
    Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
    Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relation between clinical and mammographic diagnosis of breast problems and the cancer/biopsy rate.
    Sterns EE
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 8769923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fibroadenomatoid hyperplasia: a cause of suspicious microcalcification on mammographic screening.
    Kamal M; Evans AJ; Denley H; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1331-4. PubMed ID: 9798874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities.
    White RR; Halperin TJ; Olson JA; Soo MS; Bentley RC; Seigler HF
    Ann Surg; 2001 Jun; 233(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 11371735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy.
    Sydnor MK; Wilson JD; Hijaz TA; Massey HD; Shaw de Paredes ES
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 17090707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
    Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ultrasound guided core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcifications using high frequency and power Doppler ultrasound.
    Teh WL; Wilson AR; Evans AJ; Burrell H; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
    Clin Radiol; 2000 May; 55(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 10816407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.