These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8004799)

  • 1. Metaphase quality can be monitored by automatic counting of bands.
    Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Gerdes T
    Clin Genet; 1994 Feb; 45(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8004799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic assessment of the quality of G-banded metaphases. A preliminary study.
    Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Gerdes T
    J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():152-8. PubMed ID: 1507166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of lymphocyte culture media on the number of metaphases and chromosome band resolution.
    Chomik P; Gryzinska M; Batkowska J; Jezewska-Witkowska G; Kocki J
    Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online); 2016 Oct; 70(0):1095-1100. PubMed ID: 27892892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spreading and staining of human metaphase chromosomes on aminoalkylsilane-treated glass slides.
    van Prooijen-Knegt AC; Raap AK; van der Burg MJ; Vrolijk J; van der Ploeg M
    Histochem J; 1982 Mar; 14(2):333-44. PubMed ID: 6178716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Banding resolution of amniotic cell chromosome preparations for prenatal diagnosis.
    Kao YS; Kao GA; Walters CS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Jun; 93(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 2346134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests of performance of four semi-automatic metaphase-finding and karyotyping systems.
    Korthof G; Carothers AD
    Clin Genet; 1991 Dec; 40(6):441-51. PubMed ID: 1778006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fresh and aged human lymphocyte metaphase slides are equally usable for GTG banding.
    Sajjad N; Haque S; SBurney SI; Shahid SM; Zehra S; Azhar A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2014 Sep; 27(5):1255-9. PubMed ID: 25176363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aspects of automated chromosome analysis. Different representations of banded human chromosomes and their cytogenetic evaluation.
    Lundsteen C
    Dan Med Bull; 1980 Feb; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6156802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chromosome Bandings and Recognition.
    Wan TSK; Ma ESK
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2825():137-150. PubMed ID: 38913307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
    Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
    Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semiautomated chromosome analysis. A clinical test.
    Philip J; Lundsteen C
    Clin Genet; 1985 Feb; 27(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 3978848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control in routine chromosome analysis: prediction of total number of bands for the individual case analyzed.
    Claussen U; Kleider W; Müller HG; Wille N; Baumann HA
    Clin Genet; 1992 Feb; 41(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 1544209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A system for automatic metaphase finding and semi-automatic chromosome analysis.
    van den Berg HT; de France HF
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1979; (3):213-20. PubMed ID: 396455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The application of automated metaphase scanning to direct preparations of chorionic villi.
    Zahed L; Murer-Orlando M; Bobrow M
    Prenat Diagn; 1989 Jan; 9(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 2664756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and application of an optimized drop-slide technique for metaphase chromosome spreads in maize.
    Yao Q; Gao J; Chen F; Li W
    Biotech Histochem; 2020 May; 95(4):276-284. PubMed ID: 31762324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated multiple-cell karyotyping: a clinical feasibility study.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Clin Genet; 1991 May; 39(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 1860250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A direct cytogenetic technique for mouse skin carcinomas and papillomas.
    Aldaz CM; Conti CJ; Klein-Szanto AJ; Slaga TJ
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1986 Feb; 20(3-4):223-9. PubMed ID: 3943063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the selection of systems for automated cytogenetic analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Martin AO
    Am J Med Genet; 1989 Jan; 32(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2650549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.