218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8005017)
1. Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.
DePanfilis D; Scannapieco M
Child Welfare; 1994; 73(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8005017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Family group decision making: protecting children and women.
Pennell J; Burford G
Child Welfare; 2000; 79(2):131-58. PubMed ID: 10732256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: an application of the decision making ecology through multi-level analysis.
Fluke JD; Chabot M; Fallon B; MacLaurin B; Blackstock C
Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Jan; 34(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 20056276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does family group decision making affect child welfare outcomes? Findings from a randomized control study.
Berzin SC; Cohen E; Thomas K; Dawson WC
Child Welfare; 2008; 87(4):35-54. PubMed ID: 19391466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: a methodological review.
Heneghan AM; Horwitz SM; Leventhal JM
Pediatrics; 1996 Apr; 97(4):535-42. PubMed ID: 8632942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and risk assessment frameworks: overview and implications for child maltreatment fatalities.
Pecora PJ; Chahine Z; Graham JC
Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 24199327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-rater reliability of the Illinois Structured Decision Support Protocol.
Kang HA; Poertner J
Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jun; 30(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 16782192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk and safety assessment in child welfare: instrument comparisons.
D'Andrade A; Austin MJ; Benton A
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):31-56. PubMed ID: 19064444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social services and social support: blended programs for families at risk of child maltreatment.
Miller JL; Whittaker JK
Child Welfare; 1988; 67(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 3359855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decision-making in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems.
Doueck HJ; English DJ; DePanfilis D; Moote GT
Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 8404248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Describing maltreatment: do child protective service reports and research definitions agree?
Runyan DK; Cox CE; Dubowitz H; Newton RR; Upadhyaya M; Kotch JB; Leeb RT; Everson MD; Knight ED
Child Abuse Negl; 2005 May; 29(5):461-77. PubMed ID: 15970320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Family assessment in child welfare services: instrument comparisons.
Johnson M; Stone S; Lou C; Vu CM; Ling J; Mizrahi P; Austin MJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):57-90. PubMed ID: 19064445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk assessment in child protective services: consensus and actuarial model reliability.
Baird C; Wagner D; Healy T; Johnson K
Child Welfare; 1999; 78(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 10627988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. THE SAAF STUDY: evaluation of the Safeguarding Children Assessment and Analysis Framework (SAAF), compared with management as usual, for improving outcomes for children and young people who have experienced, or are at risk of, maltreatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Macdonald G; Lewis J; Macdonald K; Gardner E; Murphy L; Adams C; Ghate D; Cotmore R; Green J
Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():453. PubMed ID: 25413974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision-making factors in cases of child neglect.
Alter CF
Child Welfare; 1985; 64(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 3979162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Child protection in Sweden: are routine assessments reliable?
Cocozza M; Gustafsson PA; Sydsjö G
Acta Paediatr; 2006 Nov; 95(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 17062480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developmental needs and individualized family service plans among infants and toddlers in the child welfare system.
Casanueva CE; Cross TP; Ringeisen H
Child Maltreat; 2008 Aug; 13(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 18495948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criteria for placement decisions in protective services.
Meddin BJ
Child Welfare; 1984; 63(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 6744984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals' child welfare attitudes.
Benbenishty R; Davidson-Arad B; López M; Devaney J; Spratt T; Koopmans C; Knorth EJ; Witteman CL; Del Valle JF; Hayes D
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():63-75. PubMed ID: 25935254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caseworker judgments and substantiation.
Cross TP; Casanueva C
Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 18794302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
