200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8005202)
1. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
Oztürk Y; Tankuter N
Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusion with bionator headgear combination appliance.
Mao J; Zhao H
J Tongji Med Univ; 1997; 17(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 9812793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
Teuscher U
Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial profile changes in early Class II correction with cervical headgear.
Kirjavainen M; Hurmerinta K; Kirjavainen T
Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):960-7. PubMed ID: 18004917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.
Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment.
Hänggi MP; Teuscher UM; Roos M; Peltomäki TA
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 18974068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Bilbo EE; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Allareddy V; Holton N; Thames AM; Otsby MS; Southard TE
Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29667470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
