These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8006482)

  • 1. Configurational differences in six skeletal landmarks in surgically treated and nonsurgically treated Class II patients.
    Bollen AM; Hujoel PP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8006482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal treatment changes in Class II subdivision malocclusions in submentovertex and posteroanterior radiographs.
    Janson G; Cruz KS; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):451-63. PubMed ID: 15470348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis.
    Singh GD; Clark WJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11298315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability of skeletal Class II correction with 2 surgical techniques: the sagittal split ramus osteotomy and the total mandibular subapical alveolar osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Kaczynski R; Shunock M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 11500654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term cephalometric changes in untreated adults compared to those treated with orthognathic surgery.
    Schubert P; Bailey LJ; White RP; Proffit WR
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10686832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Skeletal pathology and Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion. A study of 300 patients].
    Aknin JJ; Laumon B
    Orthod Fr; 1986; 57 Pt 2():741-55. PubMed ID: 3077159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Bock N; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors for Class II treatment duration.
    Popowich K; Nebbe B; Heo G; Glover KE; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15775943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of second molar eruption patterns in patients with skeletal Class II and skeletal Class I malocclusions.
    Brin I; Camasuvi S; Dali N; Aizenbud D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 17169737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duration of orthodontic treatment and mandibular lengthening by means of distraction or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with Angle Class II malocclusions.
    Breuning KH; van Strijen PJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Tuinzing DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 15643411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cephalometric evaluation of the dental and facial-skeletal effects using the Bionator with stepwise protrusive activations.
    Kumar S; Sidhu SS; Kharbanda OP
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 8619967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.