These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8006624)

  • 1. Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews.
    Horvath F; Jayne B; Buckley J
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 May; 39(3):793-807. PubMed ID: 8006624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
    Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations.
    Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Krapohl DJ; Ryan AH
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 15584845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
    Dong G; Wu H
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
    Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Truth-tellers stand the test of time and contradict evidence less than liars, even months after a crime.
    Sukumar D; Wade KA; Hodgson JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):145-155. PubMed ID: 29672094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A true denial or a false confession? Assessing veracity of suspects' statements using MASAM and SVA.
    Wojciechowski BW; Gräns M; Lidén M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198211. PubMed ID: 29856813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons.
    Elaad E
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1047-56. PubMed ID: 20229908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
    Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social indicators of deception.
    Driskell JE; Salas E; Driskell T
    Hum Factors; 2012 Aug; 54(4):577-88. PubMed ID: 22908681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-trial discrimination of truthful from deceptive responses during a game of financial risk using alpha-band MEG signals.
    Seth AK; Iversen JR; Edelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):465-76. PubMed ID: 16678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suspects, lies, and videotape: an analysis of authentic high-stake liars.
    Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 12061624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
    Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outsmarting the liars: the benefit of asking unanticipated questions.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Granhag PA; Mann S; Fisher RP; Hillman J; Sperry K
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Apr; 33(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 18523881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interviewing youthful suspects in alleged sex crimes: a descriptive analysis.
    Hershkowitz I; Horowitz D; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Sternberg KJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2004 Apr; 28(4):423-38. PubMed ID: 15120924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.