BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8007024)

  • 1. An in vivo analysis of an elliptical dental implant design.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 8007024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of surface macrotexture on the mechanical and histologic characteristics of hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Gaisser DM; Wagner WR
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 8007021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo evaluation of a CSTi dental implant: a healing time course study.
    Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):82-90. PubMed ID: 8699517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants.
    Cook SD; Baffes GC; Palafox AJ; Wolfe MW; Burgess A
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 1298818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of femoral and mandibular animal models for the evaluation of HA-coated implants.
    Cook SD; Baffes GC; Wolfe MW; Palafox AJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 1298819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo evaluation of CSTi dental implants in the presence of ligature-induced peri-implantitis.
    Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 8699512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating.
    Story BJ; Wagner WR; Gaisser DM; Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 9857585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
    Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydroxylapatite coating of porous implants improves bone ingrowth and interface attachment strength.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Dalton JE; Volkman TK; Whitecloud TS; Kay JF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Aug; 26(8):989-1001. PubMed ID: 1429760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants.
    Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 8699511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo evaluation of hydroxyapatite coatings of different crystallinities.
    Oh S; Tobin E; Yang Y; Carnes DL; Ong JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 16274146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
    Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (rhOP-1) placed with dental implants in fresh extraction sites.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Rueger DC
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 8699520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical and histological fixation of hydroxylapatite-coated pyrolytic carbon and titanium alloy implants: a report of short-term results.
    Hetherington VJ; Lord CE; Brown SA
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 8589509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
    Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
    Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
    Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental coating defects in hydroxylapatite-coated implants.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Apr; (265):280-90. PubMed ID: 1849063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):225-43. PubMed ID: 2838208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical failure of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy implants. An animal study.
    Nimb L; Gotfredsen K; Steen Jensen J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8116363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.