These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008056)
1. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity. Price AR J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NIH office plans research on misconduct. Dalton R Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Praise, for a change. Kennedy D Science; 2004 May; 304(5674):1077. PubMed ID: 15155914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases. Mosimann JE IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ORI defended. Price AR Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6560):11. PubMed ID: 8538729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ORI to study why cheaters cheat. Ready T Nat Med; 2000 Sep; 6(9):946. PubMed ID: 10973292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Scheetz MD Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ORI should stay. Ruedas LA Nature; 1994 Jun; 369(6483):701. PubMed ID: 8008056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]