162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008074)
1. Continuing controversy: doctors vs. lawyers.
Bean GO
N C Med J; 1994 Apr; 55(4):108. PubMed ID: 8008074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuing controversy: doctors vs. lawyers.
Dykers JR
N C Med J; 1994 Apr; 55(4):107-8. PubMed ID: 8008073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Doctors take the stage.
Peota C
Minn Med; 2005 Jun; 88(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 16050296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Doctors, lawyers, and personal injury. Separating myth from fact.
Lischer TK
N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):352-4; discussion 354-6. PubMed ID: 8350933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Physician competence in medical care].
Arnold K; Schuch HJ; Taut G
Zentralbl Chir; 1991; 116(18):1093-7. PubMed ID: 1763580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Malpractice nightmare' doesn't ring true.
Eisberg JF
Minn Med; 1994 Jan; 77(1):3. PubMed ID: 8127305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Where medicine meets the law.
Herman DC
Minn Med; 1994 Feb; 77(2):31-2. PubMed ID: 8177177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The defendant physician's deposition: fighting back--at last!
Clark AD; Fox PJ
Mo Med; 2002; 99(10):524-5. PubMed ID: 12534138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Liability in the hospital from the physician's viewpoint].
Specht G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):620-2; discussion 623-5. PubMed ID: 8588434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To tell you the truth.
Amatuzio J
Minn Med; 2005 Jun; 88(6):60. PubMed ID: 16050312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The defendant physician's deposition: some traps and some tips.
Jackson JZ
MD Advis; 2008; 1(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 21963544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Physician's competence responsibility and economic aspects].
Weissauer W
Chirurg; 1992 Dec; 63(12):suppl 229-32. PubMed ID: 1490401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical negligence and the law.
Murthy KK
Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(3):116-8. PubMed ID: 18624138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Captain-of-the-ship" is dead. are North Carolina physicians and surgeons still liable for the acts of other health professionals?
De Ville K
N C Med J; 1995 Apr; 56(4):166-9. PubMed ID: 7753218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Principles of medical liability and practice in medical imaging].
Thibierge M; Fournier L; Cabanis EA
J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 80(7):701-7. PubMed ID: 10431269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doctors vs. doctors.
Friedman JH
Med Health R I; 2004 Nov; 87(11):326-7. PubMed ID: 15631295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When a physician errs.
Melling C
Minn Med; 1994 Jan; 77(1):3, 30. PubMed ID: 8127306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The principles of horizontal division of labor between radiologists and other specialists in the current medical malpractice law].
Wigge P
Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):397-9. PubMed ID: 25962678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Courts let UR firms off the nook--and leave doctors on.
Azebedo D
Med Econ; 1993 Jan; 70(2):30-33, 37, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10123617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The medical liability crisis--one physician's response.
Guy JT; Silverstein HR
Conn Med; 2004; 68(10):654-5. PubMed ID: 15626144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
