BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008307)

  • 1. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
    Phelps JY; Ward JA; Szigeti J; Bowland CH; Mayer AR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jul; 84(1):128-30. PubMed ID: 8008307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
    Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
    Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
    Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicopathologic variables predictive of residual dysplasia after cervical conization.
    Schermerhorn TJ; Hodge J; Saltzman AK; Hackett TE; Sprance HE; Harrison TA
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Apr; 42(4):189-92. PubMed ID: 9131490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
    Muntz HG; Bell DA; Lage JM; Goff BA; Feldman S; Rice LW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):935-9. PubMed ID: 1448263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
    Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens.
    Townsend DE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Nov; 84(5):898. PubMed ID: 7936537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endometrial and endocervical curettage findings at the time of cervical conization.
    Presley JJ; Hernandez E; Mudafort E; Miyazawa K
    J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3560085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservative management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Shin CH; Schorge JO; Lee KR; Sheets EE
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11006022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adequacy of conization margins in adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix as a predictor of residual disease.
    Im DD; Duska LR; Rosenshein NB
    Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Nov; 59(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7590468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a more detailed evaluation of excision margins refine cytologic follow-up of women post-LLETZ for high-grade dysplasia?
    Treacy A; Devaney D; Mulligan NJ; Boyd W; O'Keane JC
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2010 Sep; 29(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 20736775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive value of endocervical curettage at cervical conization and provider practices in management of high-grade cervical dysplasia.
    Barlin JN; Bristow RE; Murillo AM; Zahurak M; Veras E; Salani R
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):129-33. PubMed ID: 20506673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical biopsy and excision procedure specimens lack sufficient predictive value for lymph-vascular space invasion seen at hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Bidus MA; Caffrey AS; You WB; Amezcua CA; Chernofsky MR; Barner R; Seidman J; Rose GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 199(2):151.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18674657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].
    Brun JL; Youbi A; Hocké C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12407327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization.
    Poynor EA; Marshall D; Sonoda Y; Slomovitz BM; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 16860853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance of cone biopsy margins in the management of patients with cervical neoplasia.
    Lubicz S; Ezekweche C; Allen A; Schiffer M
    J Reprod Med; 1984 Mar; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 6726696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of cone biopsy with findings at radical hysterectomy and use of adjuvant radiation therapy.
    Boren TP; Carrick K; Kehoe SM; Lea J; Miller DS; Richardson DL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Mar; 124(3):508-11. PubMed ID: 22108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
    Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.