These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008609)

  • 21. Effect of APF Minute-Foam on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of high-viscosity glass ionomers.
    García-Godoy F; García-Godoy A; García-Godoy F
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12762603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of hydrogen peroxide bleaching strip gels on dental restorative materials in vitro: surface microhardness and surface morphology.
    Duschner H; Götz H; White DJ; Kozak KM; Zoladz JR
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(4):105-11. PubMed ID: 15794455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
    Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fluoride release of restorative materials exposed to a fluoridated dentifrice.
    Donly KJ; Nelson JJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(4):249-50. PubMed ID: 9328674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1051-62. PubMed ID: 16386293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand.
    Von Beetzen M; Li J; Nicander I; Sundström F
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8415161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of selected mouthwashes with and without toothbrushing on the surface hardness of a resin modified glass-ionomer and two compomers.
    Sadaghiani L; Wilson MA; Wilson NH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Sep; 15(3):98-103. PubMed ID: 17970315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ.
    Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of curing time and distance on microhardness of eight light-cured liners.
    Murchison DF; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):135-41. PubMed ID: 1337601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hardness of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials as a function of depth and time.
    Roberts HW; Berzins DW; Charlton DG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 19689726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study.
    Yli-Urpo H; Närhi M; Närhi T
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):5934-41. PubMed ID: 15958240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogiannis Y; Konstantinidis A
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9573793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of bleaching agents on the surface hardness of tooth colored restorative materials.
    Taher NM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):18-26. PubMed ID: 15915201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.
    Yip HK; Lam WT; Smales RJ
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 10551132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators--results of a round robin test.
    Heintze SD; Zappini G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):304-17. PubMed ID: 15766577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.