These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008611)

  • 1. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Coudron J; Moon PC
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention and resistance provided by nine self-threading pins.
    Burgess JO; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 1803329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW; Burgess JO; Summitt JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention design for amalgam restorations: pins versus slots.
    Bailey JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 2033550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical resistance of extensive amalgam "restorations" anchored with the aid of threaded pins and amalgapins.
    Zangirolami NT; Steagall L; dos Santos Júnior J
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(1):289-93. PubMed ID: 2638492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proximal Contact Repair of Complex Amalgam Restorations.
    Zguri MN; Casey JA; Jessup JP; Vandewalle KS
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 28080293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA; Burgess JO; Batzer RC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of the resistance form of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations.
    Kane JJ; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 2066880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.