These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008812)
61. In vitro assessment of the microleakage around preventive resin (laminate) restorations. Saunders WP; Strang R; Ahmad I ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(6):433-6. PubMed ID: 2258504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Irinoda Y; Matsumura Y; Kito H; Nakano T; Toyama T; Nakagaki H; Tsuchiya T Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 11203831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Forss H; Halme E Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Clinical assessment of glass ionomer/composite resin sealant restorations in permanent teeth: results of a field trial after 1 year. Gray GB; Paterson RC Int J Paediatr Dent; 1994 Sep; 4(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 7811667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR Quintessence Int; 1998 Jan; 29(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 9611469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up. Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results. Baca P; Bravo M; Baca AP; Jiménez A; González-Rodríguez MP Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Oct; 12(6):E459-63. PubMed ID: 17909514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Aranha AC; Pimenta LA Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations. Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The differentiation of sealant restorations from preventive fissure sealants, in subjects with clear sealants. Deery C; Pitts NB Community Dent Health; 1992 Dec; 9(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 1486526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A clinical comparison of a light cured glass ionomer sealant restoration with a composite sealant restoration. Kilpatrick NM; Murray JJ; McCabe JF J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 8990684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Smales RJ Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Early loss of pit and fissure sealant: a clinical and SEM study. Futatsuki M; Kubota K; Yeh YC; Park K; Moss SJ J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 7577741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]