These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008812)

  • 61. In vitro assessment of the microleakage around preventive resin (laminate) restorations.
    Saunders WP; Strang R; Ahmad I
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(6):433-6. PubMed ID: 2258504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel.
    Irinoda Y; Matsumura Y; Kito H; Nakano T; Toyama T; Nakagaki H; Tsuchiya T
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 11203831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years.
    Forss H; Halme E
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9511837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Clinical assessment of glass ionomer/composite resin sealant restorations in permanent teeth: results of a field trial after 1 year.
    Gray GB; Paterson RC
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 1994 Sep; 4(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 7811667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years.
    Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jan; 29(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 9611469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results.
    Baca P; Bravo M; Baca AP; Jiménez A; González-Rodríguez MP
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Oct; 12(6):E459-63. PubMed ID: 17909514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Ebert J; Lohbauer U; Käppel S; ten Weges S; Petschelt A
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12744407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The differentiation of sealant restorations from preventive fissure sealants, in subjects with clear sealants.
    Deery C; Pitts NB
    Community Dent Health; 1992 Dec; 9(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 1486526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Restorations without conventional cavity preparations.
    Elderton RJ
    Int Dent J; 1988 Jun; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 3165963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A clinical comparison of a light cured glass ionomer sealant restoration with a composite sealant restoration.
    Kilpatrick NM; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    J Dent; 1996 Nov; 24(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 8990684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Early loss of pit and fissure sealant: a clinical and SEM study.
    Futatsuki M; Kubota K; Yeh YC; Park K; Moss SJ
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 7577741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Mendes FM; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():58. PubMed ID: 24884684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up.
    Bakhshandeh A; Qvist V; Ekstrand KR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr; 16(2):521-9. PubMed ID: 21479565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Composite and sealant resins--past, present, and future.
    Bowen RL
    Pediatr Dent; 1982 Mar; 4(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 6217452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A conservative occlusal restoration using fissure sealant for prevention.
    Houpt M; Shey Z
    Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1982; 3(6):445-8. PubMed ID: 6960986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.