These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8008821)

  • 1. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new approach to restorative dentistry: fabricating ceramic restorations using CEREC CAD/CAM.
    Estafan D; David A; David S; Calamia J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Jun; 20(6):555-60; quiz 562. PubMed ID: 10650368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M; Heinzmann JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 8463974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel.
    Kadokawa A; Suzuki S; Tanaka T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Oct; 96(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 17052470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials.
    Kunzelmann KH; Jelen B; Mehl A; Hickel R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jul; 4(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 11862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiopacity of direct ceramic inlay restoratives.
    el-Mowafy OM; Brown JW; McComb D
    J Dent; 1991 Dec; 19(6):366-8. PubMed ID: 1813481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 14508738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays.
    Krämer N; Kunzelmann KH; Taschner M; Mehl A; Garcia-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    J Dent Res; 2006 Dec; 85(12):1097-100. PubMed ID: 17122161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material.
    Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.