These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8009492)

  • 1. [About a comprehensive pseudonymous registry].
    Iversen OH; Hjort PF
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Feb; 114(4):487-8. PubMed ID: 8009492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A pseudonymous registry of diseases and injuries--worse than nothing?].
    Enger E; Hellandsuik P; Nesheim BI; Førde OH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Apr; 114(9):1106-7. PubMed ID: 8009533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Time to establish a national registry of cardiovascular diseases].
    Lie M; Iversen SG; Tell GS; Njølstad I
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Feb; 124(3):367-8. PubMed ID: 14963514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Is registration of multiple myeloma in the Norwegian Cancer Registry good enough?].
    Aasbrenn M; Langmark F; Wisløff F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(23):2712-4. PubMed ID: 19079417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of patient registries in surgery].
    Valen B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Oct; 122(26):2555-7. PubMed ID: 12522885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Registration of surgical wound infections. A neglected quality assurance and evaluation activity in Norwegian hospitals].
    Lystad A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Oct; 111(24):2934-5. PubMed ID: 1948893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data quality of surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Are the national vascular registries reliable?
    Dahl T; Rudjord K; Altreuther M; Myhre HO
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 31(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 16387520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [National registries have no quality guarantee. The data used should be from an unidentified material from the counties].
    Lindman A; Eliasson M; Skoglund C
    Lakartidningen; 1997 Mar; 94(10):871-3, 875-6. PubMed ID: 9102517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Think of a number!].
    Alfsen GC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Aug; 130(16):1594. PubMed ID: 20805847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The National Cancer Data Base and physician network.
    Menck HR; Blankenship C; Fremgen AM
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):45-59. PubMed ID: 10165387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer registry: aims, functions and quality control.
    Saxén EA
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1980; 50(6):588-97. PubMed ID: 7224815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assuring the quality of cancer registration in Rhode Island. Evaluation of early returns indicates future measures for enhancing reliability.
    Fulton JP; Buechner JS; Stanis D; Raimondo M
    R I Med J (1976); 1988 Sep; 71(9):337-46. PubMed ID: 3187325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Registry-based quality development in health care].
    Melsom H; Hannisdal E; Olsen B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Aug; 115(18):2234-5. PubMed ID: 7652717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The national health care registry had not found its form. Scrutiny shows the value for quality control].
    Garpenby P; Carlsson P
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Jun; 91(25):2509-11. PubMed ID: 8046964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ["The national quality registries--un unpolished diamond". The national coordinator invites to a dialogue].
    Boström M
    Lakartidningen; 2011 May 4-10; 108(18):995. PubMed ID: 21809529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of data from the SINTEF-NIS for evaluation of therapeutic quality at Norwegian hospitals].
    Steinum O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Sep; 115(23):2948. PubMed ID: 7570523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Is quality assurance of registration and publishing of therapeutic results sufficient?].
    Jørgensen JJ
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(22):3342. PubMed ID: 10533423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A national registry on diabetes--cooperation is necessary for quality].
    Falkenberg M; Wernerson M
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1318. PubMed ID: 8656857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
    Bray F; Parkin DM
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Bad quality of the Cause of Death Registry].
    Reseland S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Apr; 129(9):894. PubMed ID: 19415102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.