These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8009899)

  • 1. In vitro pressure drop comparison between two mechanical valve prostheses.
    Kim SH; Chang BC; Cho BK
    Yonsei Med J; 1994 Mar; 35(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 8009899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of aortic heart valve prostheses. Part 1: Mechanical valves.
    Knott E; Reul H; Knoch M; Steinseifer U; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Dec; 96(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 3193804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The hemodynamic performance of standard bileaflet valves is impaired by a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M; Albes JM; Krempl T; Rudolph V; Wahlers T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 23(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 12614795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.
    Mascherbauer J; Schima H; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 15473486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.
    Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.
    Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of prosthetic mitral valve geometry and orientation on flow dynamics in a model human left ventricle.
    Chandran KB; Schoephoerster R; Dellsperger KC
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 2914972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of pressure recovery in the evaluation of the Omnicarbon tilting disc valve.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Langebartels G; Steinseifer U; Schmitz-Rode T; Autschbach R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 54(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 16639678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulsatile flow past St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve. An in vitro study.
    Chandran KB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 May; 89(5):743-9. PubMed ID: 3990323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro assessment of prosthetic valve function in mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation techniques.
    Fontaine AA; He S; Stadter R; Ellis JT; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):186-98. PubMed ID: 8665014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
    Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients.
    Bach DS; Schmitz C; Dohmen G; Aaronson KD; Steinseifer U; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Aug; 144(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 22264413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Application of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves in the Polish Ventricular Assist Device: Physical and Numerical Study and First Clinical Usage.
    Malota Z; Sadowski W; Krzyskow M; Stolarzewicz B
    Artif Organs; 2016 Mar; 40(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 26365391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
    Walker PG; Yoganathan AP
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [In vitro evaluation of hydrodynamics of prosthetic heart valves].
    Okude J
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 89(11):1893-902. PubMed ID: 3205255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro study of flow regulation for pulmonary insufficiency.
    Camp TA; Stewart KC; Figliola RS; McQuinn T
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 17408334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro pulsatile flow measurements in the vicinity of mechanical heart valves in the mitral flow chamber.
    Woo YR; Yoganathan AP
    Life Support Syst; 1986; 4(2):115-39. PubMed ID: 2943945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.