These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8009899)

  • 21. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
    Hwang NH; Reul H; Reinhard P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pressure field in the vicinity of mechanical valve occluders at the instant of valve closure: correlation with cavitation initiation.
    Chandran KB; Lee CS; Chen LD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S65-75; discussion S75-6. PubMed ID: 8061871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro observations of mechanical heart valve cavitation.
    Shu MC; Leuer LH; Armitage TL; Schneider TE; Christiansen DR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S85-92; discussion S92-3. PubMed ID: 8061874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro evaluation of six mechanical and six bioprosthetic valves.
    Fisher J; Reece IJ; Wheatley DJ
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 34(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 2426828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro pulsatile flow velocity and turbulent shear stress measurements in the vicinity of mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses.
    Woo YR; Yoganathan AP
    Life Support Syst; 1985; 3(4):283-312. PubMed ID: 4068753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Asynchronous closure and leaflet impact velocity of bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
    Wu ZJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S38-49. PubMed ID: 8581210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical].
    Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A
    G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bileaflet mechanical heart valves at low cardiac output.
    Wu ZJ; Gao BZ; Slonin JH; Hwang NH
    ASAIO J; 1996; 42(5):M747-9. PubMed ID: 8944981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of mimic cardiac rate on hydrodynamics of different mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves in vitro.
    Chu YP; Cheng JL; Chen RK; Fan YB; Pu F
    Chin Med Sci J; 2005 Jun; 20(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 16075758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A statistical approach to the quantitative comparison of pulsatile flow in vitro data of prosthetic heart valve testing.
    Barbaro V; Grigioni M; Daniele C; Boccanera G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jan; 6(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 9044088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occluder closing behavior: a key factor in mechanical heart valve cavitation.
    Wu ZJ; Wang Y; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S25-33; discussion S33-4. PubMed ID: 8061868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F; Abolmaali N; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laser anemometry measurements of pulsatile flow past aortic valve prostheses.
    Chandran KB; Cabell GN; Khalighi B; Chen CJ
    J Biomech; 1983; 16(10):865-73. PubMed ID: 6643525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.
    Heinrich RS; Fontaine AA; Grimes RY; Sidhaye A; Yang S; Moore KE; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 8923988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemodynamic comparisons of polyurethane trileaflet and bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Chandran KB; Schoephoerster RT; Wurzel D; Hansen G; Yu LS; Pantalos G; Kolff WJ
    ASAIO Trans; 1989; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 2730811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic impact stress analysis of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Yuan Q; Xu L; Ngoi BK; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12578344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro velocity and turbulence measurements in the vicinity of three new mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses: Björk-Shiley Monostrut, Omni-Carbon, and Duromedics.
    Yoganathan AP; Sung HW; Woo YR; Jones M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 May; 95(5):929-39. PubMed ID: 3361941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.
    Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.