These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8010255)

  • 21. Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocols.
    Kim MJ; Chung YE; Kim KW; Chung JJ; Lim JS; Oh YT; Kim JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):185-92. PubMed ID: 16357400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hepatic spiral CT in children: scan delay time-enhancement analysis.
    Luker GD; Siegel MJ; Bradley DA; Baty JD
    Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 8657463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study.
    Awai K; Hatcho A; Nakayama Y; Kusunoki S; Liu D; Hatemura M; Funama Y; Denbo M; Sato N; Yamashita Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 16423942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimizing contrast enhancement during helical CT of the liver: a comparison of two bolus tracking techniques.
    Schweiger GD; Chang PJ; Brown BP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1551-8. PubMed ID: 9843287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material.
    Kopka L; Rodenwaldt J; Fischer U; Mueller DW; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 8888218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT; Heiken JP; Brink JA
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation.
    Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv. injection of contrast material.
    Cho JS; Kim JK; Rho SM; Lee HY; Jeong HY; Lee CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 8010251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
    Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Helical CT of the liver: evaluation of injection flow rate, mode, and scan delay with a reduced-volume contrast medium bolus.
    Kopka L; Funke M; Vosshenrich R; Hagemann A; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 7790550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dose requirements for a nonionic contrast agent for spiral computed tomography of the liver in rabbits.
    Bluemke DA; Fishman EK; Anderson JH
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8169097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimal scan delay depending on contrast material injection duration in abdominal multi-phase computed tomography of pancreas and liver in normal Beagle dogs.
    Choi SY; Lee I; Seo JW; Park HY; Choi HJ; Lee YW
    J Vet Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(4):555-561. PubMed ID: 27297414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Spiral-CT of the liver: optimizing contrast medium administration and examination technique].
    Vogl TJ; Hidajat N; Schröder RJ; Pegios W; Langer R; Neuhaus P; Felix R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jan; 6(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8852767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
    Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Heiken JP; Brink JA; McClennan BL; Sagel SS; Forman HP; DiCroce J
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 8475268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients.
    Chambers TP; Baron RL; Lush RM
    Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):518-22. PubMed ID: 7972771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimizing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in infants and children using bolus tracking.
    Frush DP; Spencer EB; Donnelly LF; Zheng JY; DeLong DM; Bisset GS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1007-13. PubMed ID: 10587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.