These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8010304)
1. Reproductive autonomy and evolutionary biology: a regulatory framework for trait-selection technologies. Jones OD Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(3):187-231. PubMed ID: 8010304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human rights and reproductive choice. Freedman LP; Isaacs SL Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 8475521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chance, choice and control: lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Scully JL; Banks S; Shakespeare TW Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jul; 63(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16459006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human rights and human dignity in the resolution of certain ethical questions in biomedicine. Wheatley S Eur Hum Rights Law Rev; 2001; 3():312-25. PubMed ID: 12449971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How will we regulate genetic enhancement? Mehlman MJ Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):671-714. PubMed ID: 12664908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive rights and responsibilities. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 8088995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The sexuality connection in reproductive health. Dixon-Mueller R Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(5):269-82. PubMed ID: 8296329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate. Bopp J; Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ending parents' unlimited power to choose: legislation is necessary to prohibit parents' selection of their children's sex and characteristics. Plummer KM St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 47(2):517-60. PubMed ID: 15478260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive health in India. Forum for Women's Health Womens Health Newsl; 1994 Aug; (23):4-7. PubMed ID: 12222516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Procreative torts: enhancing the common-law protection for reproductive autonomy. Northern KS Univ Ill Law Rev; 1998; 1998(2):489-546. PubMed ID: 12774812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers. Bloche MG Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using technology, choosing sex. The campaign against sex determination and the question of choice. Forum Against Sex Determination and Sex Pre-Selection Dev Dialogue; 1992; (1-2):91-102. PubMed ID: 12286888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The constitutional implications of human cloning. Foley EP Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy. Benshoof J Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Access to in vitro fertilization deserves increased regulation in the United States. Murphy JB J Sex Marital Ther; 2013; 39(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 23252634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolutionary conflicts of interest: are female sexual decisions different? Eberhard WG Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S19-25. PubMed ID: 15795858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic technologies and the regulation of reproductive decision-making in Australia. Karpin I; Bennett B J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16937786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]