126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8010305)
1. Elder choice.
Conard AF
Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(3):233-83. PubMed ID: 8010305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical dilemmas when patients want assistance in dying.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 8003720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Encyclical, Evangelium Vitae.
Paul PJ
Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 8934863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Suing health care providers for saving lives. Liability for providing unwanted life-sustaining treatment.
Rodriguez KF
J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):1-66. PubMed ID: 10230150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Love and let die.
Painton P; Taylor E
Time; 1990 Mar; 135(12):62-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10104321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reasons so many people support physician-assisted suicide--and why these reasons are not convincing.
Kamisar Y
Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(2):113-31. PubMed ID: 8936848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Elder choice and health care costs.
Conard AF
Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(4):39-40. PubMed ID: 10135424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues at the end of life.
Young EW
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physicians autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1994 Nov; (189):9-34. PubMed ID: 10144585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Liberty, equality, death!
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):23-4. PubMed ID: 8736671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Right to die--duty to die. The growing debate over scarce resources.
Bruder P
Hosp Top; 1994; 72(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10136314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
Mazzeo KE
Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Justice within intimate spheres.
Carse AL
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 8490226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases.
Elliott SJ
Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance directives and the persistent vegetative state in Victoria: a human rights perspective.
Porter D
J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 16304765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy.
Kamisar Y
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The aftermath of the Cruzan case in the United States.
Harvey JC
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik; 1993; (9-10):LII-LIV. PubMed ID: 8012269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A terminal case.
Sullivan JG
Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 Feb; 20(2):42-3, 45, 47-9. PubMed ID: 10164854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
