These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8010777)
1. The Angelchik prosthesis: what have we learned in fifteen years? Crookes PF; DeMeester TR Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1385-6. PubMed ID: 8010777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reoperation for complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Stewart KC; Urschel JD; Hallgren RA Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1557-8. PubMed ID: 8010802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Severe dysphagia from an Angelchik prosthesis: futility of routine esophageal testing. Demmy TL; Caron NR; Curtis JJ Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1660-1. PubMed ID: 8010825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Angelchik prosthesis--results and complications. Jamieson GG Aust N Z J Surg; 1987 Sep; 57(9):591. PubMed ID: 3689245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux. Kauten JR; Mansour KA Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Benjamin SB; Kerr R; Cohen D; Motaparthy V; Castell DO Ann Intern Med; 1984 Apr; 100(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 6367581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Angelchik prosthesis. Brown HS Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Aug; 42(2):230. PubMed ID: 3741022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis. Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Operative treatment of reflux disease of the esophagus--pro]. Becker HD; Lepsien G Z Gastroenterol; 1985 Dec; 23(12):658-64. PubMed ID: 4090566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication. Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Gear MW; Gillison EW; Dowling BL Ann Intern Med; 1985 Dec; 103(6 ( Pt 1)):959. PubMed ID: 4062106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients. Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on esophageal and gastric function. Maddern GJ; Myers JC; McIntosh N; Bridgewater FH; Jamieson GG Arch Surg; 1991 Nov; 126(11):1418-22. PubMed ID: 1747057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-abdominal migration of an antireflux prosthesis. A cause of bizarre pain. Peloso OA JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(3):351-3. PubMed ID: 7045436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis: surgical management using fundoplication. Purkiss SF; Argano VA; Kuo J; Lewis CT Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 1389267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy and thoracoscopic esophageal long myotomy for the treatment of primary esophageal motor disorders. Anselmino M; Hinder RA; Filipi CJ; Wilson P Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1993 Oct; 3(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 8261279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications of the Nissen fundoplication. Leonardi HK; Ellis FH Surg Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 63(6):1155-65. PubMed ID: 6359494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]