These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8010802)

  • 1. Reoperation for complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Stewart KC; Urschel JD; Hallgren RA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1557-8. PubMed ID: 8010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Angelchik prosthesis: what have we learned in fifteen years?
    Crookes PF; DeMeester TR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1385-6. PubMed ID: 8010777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Benjamin SB; Kerr R; Cohen D; Motaparthy V; Castell DO
    Ann Intern Med; 1984 Apr; 100(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 6367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. Long-term results.
    Kozarek RA; Brayko CM; Sanowski RA; Grobe JL; Phelps JE; Sarles H; Fredell CH
    Dig Dis Sci; 1985 Aug; 30(8):723-32. PubMed ID: 4017832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of resection of the gastroesophageal junction and jejunal interposition (Merendino procedure) as a rescue procedure in patients with a failed redo antireflux procedure. A single-center experience.
    Analatos A; Lindblad M; Rouvelas I; Elbe P; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Tsekrekos A; Tsai JA
    BMC Surg; 2018 Aug; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 30165834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiology of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux.
    Burhenne LJ; Fratkin LB; Flak B; Burhenne HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 6607635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis: surgical management using fundoplication.
    Purkiss SF; Argano VA; Kuo J; Lewis CT
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 1389267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: long-term clinical and technical follow-up.
    Thibault C; Marceau P; Biron S; Bourque RA; Béland L; Potvin M
    Can J Surg; 1994 Feb; 37(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 8306213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complications after use of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Burke PM; Chwals WJ; Ellis FH
    Arch Surg; 1985 Apr; 120(4):498-500. PubMed ID: 3885912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery.
    Awad ZT; Anderson PI; Sato K; Roth TA; Gerhardt J; Filipi CJ
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Dec; 15(12):1401-7. PubMed ID: 11965454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on esophageal and gastric function.
    Maddern GJ; Myers JC; McIntosh N; Bridgewater FH; Jamieson GG
    Arch Surg; 1991 Nov; 126(11):1418-22. PubMed ID: 1747057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An objective long-term evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Evans DF; Robertson CS; Morris DL; Ledingham SJ; Doran J; Hardcastle JD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 1759764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. A community experience.
    Smith RS; Chang FC; Hayes KA; deBakker J
    Am J Surg; 1985 Dec; 150(6):735-8. PubMed ID: 4073367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-abdominal migration of an antireflux prosthesis. A cause of bizarre pain.
    Peloso OA
    JAMA; 1982 Jul; 248(3):351-3. PubMed ID: 7045436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severe dysphagia from an Angelchik prosthesis: futility of routine esophageal testing.
    Demmy TL; Caron NR; Curtis JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1660-1. PubMed ID: 8010825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.