These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8011386)

  • 1. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Weikel W; Knopp MV; Schaeffer U; Brix G; Essig M; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Schönberg S; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.
    Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Coakley F; Reinhold C; Thomas G; Amendola M; Schwartz LH; Woodward P; Pannu H; Hricak H
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(36):5687-94. PubMed ID: 17179104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early-stage cervical cancer.
    Zhang W; Zhang J; Yang J; Xue H; Cao D; Huang H; Wu M; Cui Q; Chen J; Lang J; Shen K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1292-8. PubMed ID: 24987919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for bulky stage IB2, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix with proximal parametrial invasion.
    Huguet F; Cojocariu OM; Levy P; Lefranc JP; Darai E; Jannet D; Ansquer Y; Lhuillier PE; Benifla JL; Seince N; Touboul E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Dec; 72(5):1508-15. PubMed ID: 18676093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix].
    Pellegrino A; Cormio G; Maneo A; Vanzulli A; Villa G; Lissoni A; Landoni F
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Dec; 47(12):523-6. PubMed ID: 8720972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
    deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Poon PY
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR staging of clinical stage I and IIa cervical carcinoma: a reappraisal of efficacy and pitfalls.
    Sheu M; Chang C; Wang J; Yen M
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 38(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 11399378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of uterine cervical cancer: pharmacokinetic analysis with histopathologic correlation and its importance in predicting the outcome of radiation therapy.
    Yamashita Y; Baba T; Baba Y; Nishimura R; Ikeda S; Takahashi M; Ohtake H; Okamura H
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 10966715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
    Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evaluation of transrectal radial ultrasonography on parametrial infiltration in untreated cervical carcinoma for more accurate staging.
    Yamamoto K; Kitao M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 41(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 2664041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
    Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation - ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Coakley FV; Snyder B; Reinhold C; Schwartz LH; Woodward PJ; Pannu HK; Amendola M; Mitchell DG
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 17940305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods and characteristics of patients operated on for cervical cancer in Lithuania, 1998-2000].
    el-Aawar B
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2002; 38(6):597-610. PubMed ID: 12474666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postoperative outcomes of MR-invisible stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Lee JW; Park BK; Lee YY; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Bae DS; Kim BG; Park JJ; Park SY; Kim CK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24607752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staging uterine cervical carcinoma with low-field MR imaging.
    Hansen MA; Pedersen PH; Andreasson B; Bjerregaard B; Thomsen HS
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Nov; 41(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 11092491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.