These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8012128)

  • 1. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of faulty refraction and artificial media opacities on visual acuity perimetry].
    Hölzl MJ; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1794825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-pass resolution perimetry and light-sense perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7492934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Variability of findings in light sense and ring perimetry].
    Littan T; Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 8963140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of cupola-free perimetry with conventional perimetry: preliminary results.
    Jenni A; Hirsbrunner HP
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1990; 34(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 2079773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
    Gleissner M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
    Zulauf M; Caprioli J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.
    Virgili G; Pierrottet C; Parmeggiani F; Pennino M; Giacomelli G; Steindler P; Menchini U; Orzalesi N;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flicker perimetry resists retinal image degradation.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Gleissner M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 33(13):3539-42. PubMed ID: 1464498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Study of early glaucomatous visual field defects with the automatic perimeter Topcon SBP-1000. Comparative study with the Octopus 201 perimeter].
    Lachenmayr B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 191(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3657015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Automatic static quantitative perimetry of the central 30 degrees visual field in normal subjects].
    Huang YF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 2507260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
    Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sensitivity of the computer perimeter Competer in early glaucomatous loss of visual field. A controlled study].
    Gramer E; Gerlach R; Krieglstein GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Mar; 180(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 7078010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Perceptual disorders of the peripheral visual field caused by alcohol. Studies with the automatic Octopus perimeter].
    Riedel KG; Gilg T; Liebhardt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 186(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 3999613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.
    Brenton RS; Argus WA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 May; 28(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 3570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.