210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8012128)
21. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Reduction of retinal light sensitivity in diabetic patients].
Pahor D
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):868-72. PubMed ID: 14704945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma.
Wilensky JT; Hawkins A
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():213-7; discussion 217-8. PubMed ID: 11797309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perimetry update.
Leydhecker W
Ann Ophthalmol; 1983 Jun; 15(6):511-5, 520-1, 524-6 passim. PubMed ID: 6571428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
Bass SJ; Feldman J
Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparative analysis of the results of microperimetry and conventional computed perimetry in health].
Shpak AA; Kachalina GF; Pedanova EK
Vestn Oftalmol; 2009; 125(3):31-4. PubMed ID: 19566046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls].
Göbel K; Boyraz M; Schröder A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 Aug; 225(8):718-22. PubMed ID: 18712657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Fundus-oriented perimetry. Evaluation of a new visual field examination method for detecting angioscotoma].
Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G; Dietrich TJ; Friedrich M; Benda N
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):62-71. PubMed ID: 8992085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
Matsumoto C; Takada S; Okuyama S; Arimura E; Hashimoto S; Shimomura Y
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visual field changes after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Brown SM; Bradley JC; Xu KT; Chadwick AA; McCartney DL
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):687-93. PubMed ID: 15899443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [15 years automated perimetry--where does the path lead?].
Lachenmayr B; Lund OE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Dec; 205(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 7869681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Sensitivity and specificity of masked field campimetry].
Schiefer U; Pfau U; Selbmann HK; Wilhelm H; Zrenner E
Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 7780274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Is cheating with automatic perimetry possible?].
Rodallec T; Hamelin N; Blatrix C; Brion F; Mathieu C; Goemaere I; Nordmann JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2003 Jun; 26(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 12910198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Liquid crystal display microperimetry in eyes with reduced visual acuity from macular pathology.
Chalam KV; Shah VA
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 52(4):293-6. PubMed ID: 15693320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A method of scoring automated visual fields to determine field constriction causing blindness.
Dandona L; Nanda A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 46(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9847482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Follow-up of retrobulbar neuritis with the octopus computer perimeter (author's transl)].
Gramer E; Krieglstein GK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Dec; 179(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 7343722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
