BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8012641)

  • 1. In vitro heart valve testing: steady versus pulsatile flow.
    Black MM; Hose DR; Lamb CJ; Lawford PV; Ralph SJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Mar; 3(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 8012641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A statistical approach to the quantitative comparison of pulsatile flow in vitro data of prosthetic heart valve testing.
    Barbaro V; Grigioni M; Daniele C; Boccanera G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jan; 6(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 9044088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
    Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of pulsatile blood flow through the curved bileaflet mechanical heart valve installed in two different types of blood vessels: velocity and pressure of blood flow.
    Bang JS; Yoo SM; Kim CN
    ASAIO J; 2006; 52(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16760710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation technique for bileaflet mechanical valves.
    Shipkowitz T; Ambrus J; Kurk J; Wickramasinghe K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 12000172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An integrated macro/micro approach to evaluating pivot flow within the Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Shu MC; Gross JM; O'Rourke KK; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):503-12. PubMed ID: 12918854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow characterization of the ADVANTAGE and St. Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
    Shu MC; O'Rourke KK; Coppin CM; Lemmon JD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Sep; 13(5):814-22. PubMed ID: 15473485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new flow model for Doppler ultrasound study of prosthetic heart valves.
    Durand LG; Garcia D; Sakr F; Sava H; Cimon R; Pibarot P; Fenster A; Dumesnil JG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 10096489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Principal stress analysis in LDA measurement of the flow field downstream of 19-mm Sorin Bicarbon heart valve.
    Barbaro V; Grigioni M; Daniele C; D'Avenio G
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Nov; 6(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 9924953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
    Hwang NH; Reul H; Reinhard P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure and flow fields in the hinge region of bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
    Gao ZB; Hosein N; Dai FF; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Mar; 8(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 10224581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction simulation of bileaflet mechanical heart valve flow dynamics.
    Cheng R; Lai YG; Chandran KB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):772-80. PubMed ID: 14658820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical simulation of opening process in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve under pulsatile flow condition.
    Shi Y; Zhao Y; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 12701798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical analysis on the hemodynamics and leaflet dynamics in a bileaflet mechanical heart valve using a fluid-structure interaction method.
    Choi CR; Kim CN
    ASAIO J; 2009; 55(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 19730001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational fluid dynamics study of a protruded-hinge bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Wang J; Yao H; Lim CJ; Zhao Y; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):254-262; discussion 263. PubMed ID: 11297213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of structural compliance on cavitation threshold measurement of mechanical heart valves.
    Guo GX; Adlparvar P; Howanec M; Roy J; Kafesjian R; Kingsbury C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S77-83; discussion S83-4. PubMed ID: 8061872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.
    Bernacca GM; McColl JH; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 15222295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.