These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8013198)
1. The detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue--comparison of conventional and digital radiography. Roobottom CA; Weston MJ Clin Radiol; 1994 May; 49(5):330-2. PubMed ID: 8013198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation. Reiner B; Siegel E; McLaurin T; Pomerantz S; Allman R; Hebel JR; Fritz S; Protopapas Z AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 8659358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Image Postprocessing in Digital Radiography to Detect Wooden, Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies. Kleinfelder TR; Ng CK Radiol Technol; 2022; 93(6):544-554. PubMed ID: 35790309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Demonstration of non-metallic foreign bodies by conventional x-ray techniques and computer tomography. Absorption coefficient of glass, plastic and wood (author's transl)]. Schmitt WG; Hübener KH Rofo; 1981 Aug; 135(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 6212316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study. Javadrashid R; Fouladi DF; Golamian M; Hajalioghli P; Daghighi MH; Shahmorady Z; Niknejad MT Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140229. PubMed ID: 25426703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them? Ingraham CR; Mannelli L; Robinson JD; Linnau KF Emerg Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 25648360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The detection of wooden foreign bodies: An experimental study comparing direct digital radiography (DDR) and ultrasonography. Mercado LNS; Hayre CM Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):340-344. PubMed ID: 30292503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved Detection of Foreign Bodies on Radiographs Using X-ray Dark-Field and Phase-Contrast Imaging. Hellbach K; Beller E; Schindler A; Schoeppe F; Hesse N; Baumann A; Schinner R; Auweter S; Hauke C; Radicke M; Meinel FG Invest Radiol; 2018 Jun; 53(6):352-356. PubMed ID: 29420322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography. Ginsburg MJ; Ellis GL; Flom LL Ann Emerg Med; 1990 Jun; 19(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 2188542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. Oikarinen KS; Nieminen TM; Mäkäräinen H; Pyhtinen J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 22(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 8320449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study. Javadrashid R; Golamian M; Shahrzad M; Hajalioghli P; Shahmorady Z; Fouladi DF; Sadrarhami S; Akhoundzadeh L Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 May; 68(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26899378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms. Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. Aras MH; Miloglu O; Barutcugil C; Kantarci M; Ozcan E; Harorli A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 20100917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of foreign bodies in the hand. Russell RC; Williamson DA; Sullivan JW; Suchy H; Suliman O J Hand Surg Am; 1991 Jan; 16(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1995686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semi-quantitative scoring of imaging modalities in detecting soft tissue foreign bodies: an in vitro study. Alfuraih AM; Almutairi FN; Alotaibi SB; Alshmrani AA Acta Radiol; 2022 Apr; 63(4):474-480. PubMed ID: 33673754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies. Manthey DE; Storrow AB; Milbourn JM; Wagner BJ Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 8669741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography, ultrasonography and plain radiography in the detection of foreign bodies in pork muscle tissue. Torfing KF; Teisen HG; Skjødt T Rofo; 1988 Jul; 149(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 2840712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonographic detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue. A human cadaver study. Blyme PJ; Lind T; Schantz K; Lavard P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1990; 110(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 2288801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound for the detection of foreign bodies in human tissue. Hill R; Conron R; Greissinger P; Heller M Ann Emerg Med; 1997 Mar; 29(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 9055774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro study comparing two different film-screen combinations in the detection of impacted fish bones. Abdullah BJ; Kaur H; Ng KH Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):930-3. PubMed ID: 10195007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]