181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8013402)
1. Use of rodent carcinogenicity test results for determining potential cancer risk to humans.
Infante PF
Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):143-8. PubMed ID: 8013402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens.
Ashby J
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1996 Mar; 15(3):183-202. PubMed ID: 8839204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of cell proliferation data in cancer risk assessment: FDA view.
Scheuplein RJ
Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Dec; 101 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):139-41. PubMed ID: 8013401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
Vainio H; Hemminki K
J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of carcinogenicity from two versus four sex-species groups in the carcinogenic potency database.
Gold LS; Slone TH
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1993 May; 39(1):143-57. PubMed ID: 8492327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expectations for transgenic rodent cancer bioassay models.
Ashby J
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():177-82. PubMed ID: 11695555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals in humans from rodent bioassay data.
Goodman G; Wilson R
Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Aug; 94():195-218. PubMed ID: 1954931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International regulatory needs for development of an IATA for non-genotoxic carcinogenic chemical substances.
Jacobs MN; Colacci A; Louekari K; Luijten M; Hakkert BC; Paparella M; Vasseur P
ALTEX; 2016; 33(4):359-392. PubMed ID: 27120445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An enhanced thirteen-week bioassay as an alternative for screening for carcinogenesis factors.
Cohen SM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 20593920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cancer risks projected from animal bioassays to epidemiologic studies of acrylonitrile-exposed workers.
Ward CE; Starr TB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Oct; 18(2):214-32. PubMed ID: 8278643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental pollution, pesticides, and the prevention of cancer: misconceptions.
Ames BN; Gold LS
FASEB J; 1997 Nov; 11(13):1041-52. PubMed ID: 9367339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Categorizing the characteristics of human carcinogens: a need for specificity.
Smith CJ; Perfetti TA; Hayes AW; Berry SC; Trosko JE; King JA; Goodman JI; Begley CG; Dayan A
Arch Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 95(8):2883-2889. PubMed ID: 34148101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Important Points at Interpretation ofNongenotoxic-Carcinogenicity Induced by Pesticidesin Rodent Bioassays].
Satoh H; Machino S; Fujii T; Yoshida M; Asano S; Yokoyama Y; Miyajima K
Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2022; 63(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 35264520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is peroxisome proliferation an obligatory precursor step in the carcinogenicity of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)?
Melnick RL
Environ Health Perspect; 2001 May; 109(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 11401753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beware of a new carcinogenic risk: promotion of promoters.
Bounias M; Bonaly A
Toxicol Lett; 1995 Oct; 80(1-3):19-24. PubMed ID: 7482586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Opportunities for an alternative integrating testing strategy for carcinogen hazard assessment?
Doktorova TY; Pauwels M; Vinken M; Vanhaecke T; Rogiers V
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 42(2):91-106. PubMed ID: 22141324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system.
Knight A; Bailey J; Balcombe J
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():139-47. PubMed ID: 16555967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
