These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8014151)

  • 1. Cumulative selection and genetic change for weaning or yearling weight or for yearling weight plus muscle score in Hereford cattle.
    Koch RM; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Apr; 72(4):864-85. PubMed ID: 8014151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct and maternal genetic responses to selection for weaning or yearling weight or for yearling weight and muscle score in Hereford cattle.
    Koch RM; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Oct; 73(10):2951-8. PubMed ID: 8617665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parameter estimates for direct, maternal, and grandmaternal genetic effects for birth weight and weaning weight in Hereford cattle.
    Dodenhoff J; Van Vleck LD; Kachman SD; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2521-7. PubMed ID: 9814889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection for increased weaning or yearling weight in Hereford cattle. II. Direct and correlated responses.
    Frahm RR; Nichols CG; Buchanan DS
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Jun; 60(6):1385-95. PubMed ID: 4019335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selection for increased weaning or yearling weight in Hereford cattle. I. Measurement of selection applied.
    Frahm RR; Nichols CG; Buchanan DS
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Jun; 60(6):1373-84. PubMed ID: 4019334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Number of calves born, number of calves weaned, and cumulative weaning weight as measures of lifetime production for Hereford cows.
    Martinez GE; Koch RM; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1903-11. PubMed ID: 15309935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic response to selection for weaning weight or yearling weight or yearling weight and muscle score in Hereford cattle: efficiency of gain, growth, and carcass characteristics.
    Koch RM; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Mar; 82(3):668-82. PubMed ID: 15032423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of sire breed solutions for growth traits adjusted by mean expected progeny differences to a 1993 base.
    Barkhouse KL; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Buchanan DS; Marshall DM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2287-93. PubMed ID: 9781484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex effects on breed of sire differences for birth, weaning, and yearling weights.
    Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1528-34. PubMed ID: 9655571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of selection by independent culling levels for below-average birth weight and high yearling weight with mass selection for high yearling weight in line 1 Hereford cattle.
    MacNeil MD; Urick JJ; Snelling WM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):458-67. PubMed ID: 9498353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic parameter estimates of ultrasound-measured longissimus muscle area and 12th rib fat thickness in Brangus cattle.
    Johnson MZ; Schalles RR; Dikeman ME; Golden BL
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Oct; 71(10):2623-30. PubMed ID: 8226361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models.
    Ferreira GB; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2641-50. PubMed ID: 10521023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection for weaning weight and postweaning gain in Hereford cattle. I. Population structure and selection applied.
    Irgang R; Dillard EU; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1985 May; 60(5):1133-41. PubMed ID: 4008361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic parameters estimated with multitrait and linear spline-random regression models using Gelbvieh early growth data.
    Iwaisaki H; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):757-63. PubMed ID: 15753329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variance components for direct and maternal effects on body weights of Katahdin lambs.
    Ngere L; Burke JM; Notter DR; Morgan JLM
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3396-3405. PubMed ID: 28805892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic evaluation of growth in a multibreed beef cattle population using random regression-linear spline models.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):267-77. PubMed ID: 17965329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection for weaning weight and postweaning gain in Hereford cattle. III. Correlated responses to selection in milk yield, preweaning and postweaning traits.
    Irgang R; Dillard EU; Tess MW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1985 May; 60(5):1156-64. PubMed ID: 4008363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parameter estimates for direct and maternal genetic effects on yearling, eighteen-month, and slaughter weights of Korean native cattle.
    Lee JW; Choi SB; Jung YH; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1414-21. PubMed ID: 10875621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of Line 1 Hereford females resulting from selection by independent culling levels for below-average birth weight and high yearling weight or by mass selection for high yearling weight.
    MacNeil MD; Urick JJ; Decoudu G
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Sep; 78(9):2292-8. PubMed ID: 10985402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.