These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8015122)

  • 1. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals.
    Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Grimes DA; Altman DG
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 8015122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The methodologic quality of randomization as assessed from reports of trials in specialist and general medical journals.
    Schulz KF; Chalmers I; Altman DG; Grimes DA; Doré CJ
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1995 Aug; Doc No 197():[81 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8542098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology.
    Schulz KF; Grimes DA; Altman DG; Hayes RJ
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7033):742-4. PubMed ID: 8605459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodology citations and the quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 174(4):1312-5. PubMed ID: 8623862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How well are randomized controlled trials reported in the dermatology literature?
    Adetugbo K; Williams H
    Arch Dermatol; 2000 Mar; 136(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 10724201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
    Parent N; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review.
    Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 23648066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secular changes in the quality of published randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
    Hill CL; LaValley MP; Felson DT
    Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Mar; 46(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 11920415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals.
    Doulaveris G; Vani K; Saccone G; Chauhan SP; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100509. PubMed ID: 34656731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals.
    Hewitt C; Hahn S; Torgerson DJ; Watson J; Bland JM
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1057-8. PubMed ID: 15760970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
    Pildal J; Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1049. PubMed ID: 15817527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a survey of 13 randomly selected journals from mainland China.
    Wang G; Mao B; Xiong ZY; Fan T; Chen XD; Wang L; Liu GJ; Liu J; Guo J; Chang J; Wu TX; Li TQ;
    Clin Ther; 2007 Jul; 29(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 17825697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Allocation concealment: a methodological review.
    Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):708-12. PubMed ID: 23648092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of reporting in infertility journals.
    Glujovsky D; Boggino C; Riestra B; Coscia A; Sueldo CE; Ciapponi A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 25455871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.
    Xu L; Li J; Zhang M; Ai C; Wang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 18579449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The journal impact factor as a predictor of trial quality and outcomes: cohort study of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Gluud LL; Sørensen TI; Gøtzsche PC; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Nov; 100(11):2431-5. PubMed ID: 16279896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.
    Mills E; Loke YK; Wu P; Montori VM; Perri D; Moher D; Guyatt G
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 58(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15206994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
    Wu T; Li Y; Bian Z; Liu G; Moher D
    Trials; 2009 Jul; 10():46. PubMed ID: 19573242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.