These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors? Laube RE BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. [Plagiarism in scientific publications]. Reyes B H Rev Med Chil; 2009 Jan; 137(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19399315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. How far do you trust your colleagues? Neufeld A New Sci; 1987 Jan; 113(1543):59. PubMed ID: 11655810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. A case of plagiarism: lessons for editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and plagiarists. Alspach JG Crit Care Nurse; 2014 Oct; 34(5):12-6. PubMed ID: 25274760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study. Kotchoubey B; Bütof S; Sitaram R Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):829-35. PubMed ID: 25156788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France. Maisonneuve H BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and scientific misconduct: preventive and correction action. Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V Vaccine; 2013 Apr; 31(14):1765. PubMed ID: 23328314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Conflicts of interest for medical publishers and editors: protecting the integrity of scientific scholarship. Desai SS; Shortell CK J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3 Suppl):59S-63S. PubMed ID: 21872119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct? Wager E Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 25711228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects? Garfield E Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Etiquette in scientific publishing. Krishnan V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 24075666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Withdrawal of aegis? So what's that? Hammerschmidt DE; Gross AG J Lab Clin Med; 1994 Jun; 123(6):792-4. PubMed ID: 8201252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Editors' responsibility in defeating fraud. Meguid MM Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):13. PubMed ID: 10331380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]